TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Acer Nitro AN515-57

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics4.46% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive298% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemAcer Nitro AN515-57  (all builds)
MotherboardTGL Scala_TLS
Memory9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210919
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateFeb 08 '22 at 17:45
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11400H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
84.6% Excellent
Memory 66.6
1-Core 160
2-Core 310
94% 179 Pts
4-Core 552
8-Core 785
84% 668 Pts
64-Core 927
57% 927 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑
This bench: 84.6%
 Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Acer(1025 1539) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9565
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
4.46% Terrible
Lighting 4.5
Reflection 53.1
Parallax 5.6
4% 21.1 fps
MRender 9.1
Gravity 6.6
Splatting 6.7
6% 7.47 fps
Poor: 3% ↑
This bench: 4.46%
 Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme HFM512GD3JX016N 512GB
338GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 41020C20 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2239 945 526 542 470 450 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
298% Outstanding
Read 2,432
Write 2418
Mixed 1,691
SusWrite 862
414% 1,851 MB/s
4K Read 72.8
4K Write 191
4K Mixed 102
343% 122 MB/s
DQ Read 1,042
DQ Write 801
DQ Mixed 889
674% 911 MB/s
Poor: 159% ↑
This bench: 298%
 Great: 304%
Nvme Netac SSD 512GB
392GB free
Firmware: U0914A0L Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 39 59 50 48 53 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
605% Outstanding
Read 5,146
Write 63.5
Mixed 124
SusWrite 50.8
280% 1,346 MB/s
4K Read 982
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 7.9
1,500% 331 MB/s
Poor: 139% ↑
This bench: 605%
 Great: 605%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E1 Lexar Co Limited LD4AS008G-H3200GST 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
59.6% Above average
MC Read 21.5
MC Write 22.4
MC Mixed 18.7
60% 20.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 30
SC Mixed 16.4
59% 20.7 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
Poor: 48% ↑
This bench: 59.6%
 Great: 84%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Nitro AN515-57 Builds (Compare 15,199 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Nitro AN515-57

CPU
Core i5-11400HIntelBench 80%, 35,470 samples9,390x
Core i7-11800HIntelBench 88%, 56,029 samples5,227x
Core i9-11900HIntelBench 89%, 6,494 samples569x
GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 4%, 25,082 samples5,214x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 7%, 53,008 samples3,045x
RTX 3060 (Laptop)NvidiaBench 90%, 102,706 samples1,830x
SSD
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G-1114 512GBNvmeBench 186%, 8,325 samples4,159x
HFM512GD3JX016N 512GBNvmeBench 244%, 4,593 samples3,789x
KINGSTON OM8PDP3256B-AA1 256GBNvmeBench 158%, 2,168 samples1,214x
RAM
M471A1K43EB1-CWE 2x8GBSamsungBench 86%, 38,732 samples2,922x
M471A1K43EB1-CWE 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 14,450 samples2,208x
M471A2K43EB1-CWE 1x16GBSamsungBench 46%, 7,758 samples832x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback