MSI Z370 GAMING M5 (MS-7B58)

Performance Results


Gaming 104% UFO	Desktop 90% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 95% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	121% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	73.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Micro-Star MS-7B58
Motherboard	MSI Z370 GAMING M5 (MS-7B58) (all builds)
Memory	11.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2715 x 1527 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20190404
Uptime	3.9 Days
Run Date	Feb 05 '22 at 17:02
Run Duration	223 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	23%

Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 10600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700K-$184 746,287 User benchmarks, average bench 88% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	87.1% Excellent	Memory 94.7 1-Core 127 2-Core 228 86% 150 Pts	4-Core 427 8-Core 734 70% 581 Pts	64-Core 951 59% 951 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 87.1% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210 663,603 User benchmarks, average bench 115% MSI(1462 C726) CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 511.65 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	121% Outstanding	Lighting 160 Reflection 157 Parallax 174 130% 163 fps	MRender 189 Gravity 135 Splatting 120 118% 148 fps
Poor: 105% ↑ This bench: 121% Great: 123%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 440GB free Firmware: RVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 372 401 409 432 440 438 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	99.1% Outstanding	Read 469 Write 438 Mixed 389 SusWrite 415 96% 428 MB/s	4K Read 33.6 4K Write 88.9 4K Mixed 50.2 162% 57.6 MB/s	DQ Read 44.4 DQ Write 134 DQ Mixed 64.3 56% 81 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 99.1% Great: 133%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$98 201,200 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 227GB free Firmware: RVQ01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 372 241 82 82 83 83 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	79.3% Very good	Read 476 Write 443 Mixed 385 SusWrite 157 82% 365 MB/s	4K Read 30.3 4K Write 94.9 4K Mixed 42.4 150% 55.9 MB/s	DQ Read 37.1 DQ Write 141 DQ Mixed 53.7 52% 77.3 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 79.3% Great: 121%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 300GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 224 288 292 287 295 293 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	73.3% Very good	Read 455 Write 297 Mixed 255 SusWrite 280 72% 321 MB/s	4K Read 14.4 4K Write 87.8 4K Mixed 32.3 110% 44.8 MB/s	DQ Read 32.4 DQ Write 134 DQ Mixed 40.9 44% 69.1 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 73.3% Great: 129%
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$100 129,044 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 366GB free Firmware: SVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 372 401 411 432 440 439 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	104% Outstanding	Read 472 Write 442 Mixed 431 SusWrite 416 99% 440 MB/s	4K Read 39.6 4K Write 91.1 4K Mixed 53.4 177% 61.4 MB/s	DQ Read 51.1 DQ Write 140 DQ Mixed 71.1 61% 87.5 MB/s
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 137%
QNAP TR-004 DISK00 3TB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 664GB free, PID 0013 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.5 5 4.9 2.4 1.6 2.4 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	30% Below average	Read 164 Write 129 Mixed 67.4 SusWrite 3.8 108% 91 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 88% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 30% Great: 50%
QNAP TR-004 DISK01 3TB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 2TB free, PID 0013 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 87 89 89 86 89 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	51.1% Above average	Read 180 Write 145 Mixed 67 SusWrite 87 150% 120 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.8 94% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 51.1% Great: 55%
QNAP TR-004 DISK02 500GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 80GB free, PID 0013 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 88 89 89 87 89 MB/s Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	37.9% Below average	Read 88.4 Write 89 Mixed 41.2 SusWrite 87.7 102% 76.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.8 94% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 37.9% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMR16GX4M2C3600C18 4x8GB 859 User benchmarks, average bench 97% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	64.4% Good	MC Read 23.1 MC Write 24.1 MC Mixed 20.5 64% 22.6 GB/s	SC Read 12.6 SC Write 21.8 SC Mixed 18.2 50% 17.5 GB/s	Latency 57.8 69% 57.8 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 64.4% Great: 123%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z370 GAMING M5 (MS-7B58) Builds (Compare 2,192 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 112%

UFO

Desktop 96%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 102%

UFO

Motherboard: MSI Z370 GAMING M5 (MS-7B58) - $185

CPU
Core i7-8700KIntel $184Bench 88%, 746,287 samples	1,285x
Core i5-8600KIntel $139Bench 91%, 264,837 samples	303x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	135x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	303x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	191x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	135x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $86Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	94x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	85x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $140Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	84x

RAM
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	65x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	62x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $24Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	61x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 81% - Excellent

Total price: $995

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16