Acer Aspire M7810

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 51% Yacht	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	2.17% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	35.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

21 months ago, 19 months ago.

System	Acer Aspire M7810 (all builds)
Motherboard	Acer FMP55
Memory	3.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20091127
Uptime	1.2 Days
Run Date	Aug 24 '22 at 13:59
Run Duration	308 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 650-$70 42,063 User benchmarks, average bench 46% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	51.9% Above average	Memory 69.2 1-Core 80.7 2-Core 135 57% 95 Pts	4-Core 201 8-Core 204 27% 203 Pts	64-Core 204 13% 204 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 51.9% Great: 53%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 220 19,671 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Sapphire(174B 2160) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01 Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	2.17% Terrible	Lighting 2.7 Reflection 1 Parallax 1.3 2% 1.67 fps	MRender 3.3 Gravity 1.9 Splatting 2.6 2% 2.6 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.17% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$30 133,640 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 86GB free (System drive) Firmware: Z32080RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 54 51 39 34 37 MB/s Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	35.5% Below average	Read 206 Write 204 Mixed 211 SusWrite 55.9 38% 169 MB/s	4K Read 12.6 4K Write 35.6 4K Mixed 13.3 55% 20.5 MB/s	DQ Read 152 DQ Write 173 DQ Mixed 5.1 48% 110 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 35.5% Great: 86%
Samsung Spinpoint T166 500GB-$40 43,024 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 466GB free Firmware: CR100-11 SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 78 80 78 78 77 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	43.9% Average	Read 74.4 Write 34.5 Mixed 39 SusWrite 78.3 42% 56.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 144% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 43.9% Great: 44%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$60 235,501 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 1.5TB free Firmware: CC26 SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 158 162 162 160 162 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	85.3% Excellent	Read 138 Write 128 Mixed 71.5 SusWrite 160 91% 124 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.9 155% 1 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 85.3% Great: 113%
QNAP TR-004 DISK01 3TB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 3TB free, PID 0013 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.8 13 14 14 14 15 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	13.6% Very poor	Read 32.6 Write 27.3 Mixed 25.8 SusWrite 13.1 32% 24.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.7 91% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 13.6% Great: 55%
QNAP TR-004 DISK02 2TB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 2TB free, PID 0013 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 13 14 14 14 14 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	15.2% Very poor	Read 32.3 Write 27.9 Mixed 26.4 SusWrite 14.9 33% 25.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1 115% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 15.2% Great: 44%
QNAP TR-004 DISK03 2TB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 1.5TB free, PID 0013 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.2 0.1 0 0.2 0.1 0.9 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	11.4% Very poor	Read 32.3 Write 27.6 Mixed 25.6 SusWrite 0.2 27% 21.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.9 105% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 11.4% Great: 138%
QNAP TR-004 DISK00 8TB 21 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 3.5TB free, PID 0013 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	15.9% Very poor	Read 29.8 Write 27.8 Mixed 29.4 SusWrite 0 28% 21.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 3.7 4K Mixed 0.8 156% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 15.9% Great: 97%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5673EH1-CH9 4x2GB 1,085 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM 1333 MHz Performing below potential (40^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	31.7% Below average	MC Read 10.4 MC Write 9 MC Mixed 13.8 32% 11.1 GB/s	SC Read 8.5 SC Write 7.5 SC Mixed 8.2 23% 8.07 GB/s	Latency 103 39% 103 ns
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 31.7% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Aspire M7810 Builds (Compare 22 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

System: Acer Aspire M7810

CPU
Core i7 860Intel $320Bench 64%, 51,451 samples	14x
Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples	5x
Core i5-750Intel $72Bench 62%, 43,796 samples	2x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	5x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	3x
GeForce GT 220NvidiaBench 2%, 19,671 samples	3x

SSD
870 QVO 1TBSamsung $113Bench 95%, 80,665 samples	2x
HyperX 3K 120GBKingston $100Bench 74%, 46,066 samples	1x
840 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 96%, 217,115 samples	1x

RAM
M378B5673EH1-CH9 4x2GBSamsungBench 38%, 1,085 samples	2x
HMT125U6BFR8C-H9 4x2GBHynixBench 38%, 703 samples	2x
GU512303EP0202 4x2GBUnknownBench 37%, 604 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $492

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16