Asus H87-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics17.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive39.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus H87-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory19.9 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140728
Uptime7.2 Days
Run DateFeb 05 '22 at 15:47
Run Duration185 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4430-$124
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
66.7% Good
Memory 83.4
1-Core 83.9
2-Core 166
66% 111 Pts
4-Core 291
8-Core 284
39% 288 Pts
64-Core 305
19% 305 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 471.11
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
17.3% Very poor
Lighting 21.4
Reflection 18.3
Parallax 22.8
17% 20.8 fps
MRender 25
Gravity 23
Splatting 16.8
17% 21.6 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 17.3%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ AGILITY3 60GB
8GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 49 43 43 41 42 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
39.9% Below average
Read 154
Write 58.9
Mixed 86.6
SusWrite 44.6
19% 86.1 MB/s
4K Read 24.5
4K Write 56.1
4K Mixed 20.5
93% 33.7 MB/s
DQ Read 77.5
DQ Write 59.4
DQ Mixed 65.5
50% 67.5 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 51%
Samsung HD250HJ 250GB
41GB free
Firmware: FH100-05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 88 94 94 93 94 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
51.1% Above average
Read 86.4
Write 87.3
Mixed 52.7
SusWrite 91.8
58% 79.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
136% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 56%
WD Purple 1TB (2014)-$60
616GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 51 59 57 55 56 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
22% Poor
Read 20.6
Write 31.5
Mixed 28.4
SusWrite 56
25% 34.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.1
24% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 22%
Great: 85%
Toshiba External USB 3.0 500GB
88GB free, PID a007
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 19 25 22 22 22 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
8.56% Terrible
Read 17.5
Write 19.1
Mixed 13.4
SusWrite 21.9
25% 18 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.1
17% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 8.56%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9965525-140.A00LF 9965525-140.A00LF 24GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
47.8% Average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 17.6
MC Mixed 14.9
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 15.7
SC Mixed 15.2
41% 14.4 GB/s
Latency 74.4
54% 74.4 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H87-PLUS Builds (Compare 855 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H87-PLUS - $128

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $284
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback