Shuttle SH67H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics17.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive60.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemShuttle SH67H  (all builds)
MotherboardShuttle FH67H
Memory14 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140911
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateFeb 04 '22 at 20:40
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470S
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
68.2% Good
Memory 77.1
1-Core 94.7
2-Core 181
68% 117 Pts
4-Core 343
8-Core 343
46% 343 Pts
64-Core 335
21% 335 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
CLim: 1333 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 397.64
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
17.6% Very poor
Lighting 21.9
Reflection 18.6
Parallax 21.2
18% 20.6 fps
MRender 24.1
Gravity 23
Splatting 16.9
17% 21.3 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 17.6%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
386GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S3401103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 234 212 18 337 18 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
60.1% Good
Read 443
Write 19.4
Mixed 41.6
SusWrite 139
35% 161 MB/s
4K Read 23.4
4K Write 25
4K Mixed 22.7
78% 23.7 MB/s
DQ Read 111
DQ Write 327
DQ Mixed 27.2
76% 155 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 102%
CHN 25SATAC3 120 120GB
34GB free
Firmware: R0809B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 312 242 87 51 53 52 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
72.2% Very good
Read 464
Write 400
Mixed 383
SusWrite 133
77% 345 MB/s
4K Read 26.2
4K Write 84.4
4K Mixed 24.3
116% 45 MB/s
DQ Read 175
DQ Write 321
DQ Mixed 44
91% 180 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 82%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX 9905403-440.A00LF KHX1600C9D3/4GX 9905403-440.A00LF 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
50.1% Above average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 18.8
MC Mixed 15.9
49% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 16.5
SC Mixed 16.6
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 86.1
46% 86.1 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SH67H Builds (Compare 111 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

System: Shuttle SH67H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $432
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback