Sicomputer Work

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics4.45% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive85.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemSicomputer Work  (all builds)
MotherboardMicro-Star MB-SI-H310V1 (MS-7C09)
Memory4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200826
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 04 '22 at 15:07
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-9320
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
89.6% Excellent
Memory 88.5
1-Core 134
2-Core 268
90% 164 Pts
4-Core 525
8-Core 513
70% 519 Pts
64-Core 479
30% 479 Pts
Poor: 77%
This bench: 89.6%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i3)
MSI(1462 7C09) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
4.45% Terrible
Lighting 6.8
Reflection 7.1
Parallax 7.9
6% 7.27 fps
MRender 0.3
Gravity 8.8
Splatting 0.2
2% 3.1 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.45%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 120GB-$15
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 378 238 60 74 72 66 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
85.7% Excellent
Read 501
Write 373
Mixed 384
SusWrite 148
78% 352 MB/s
4K Read 34.7
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 30.1
154% 61 MB/s
DQ Read 176
DQ Write 317
DQ Mixed 46.8
92% 180 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 85.7%
Great: 86%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9
9GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.4 3.7 14 14 14 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
6.99% Terrible
Read 21.2
Write 0.2
Mixed 2.7
SusWrite 11.7
9% 8.95 MB/s
4K Read 5.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
22% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.99%
Great: 28%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
46.6% Average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 16.2
MC Mixed 14.2
45% 15.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 16.7
SC Mixed 15.5
42% 14.8 GB/s
Latency 69
58% 69 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Work Builds (Compare 25 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Sicomputer Work

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $99
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback