Aftershock GK5CN5Z (APEX - 15)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics6.35% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive78.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemAftershock GK5CN5Z (APEX - 15)  (all builds)
MotherboardStandard AFTERSHOCK
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180323
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 04 '22 at 14:41
Run Duration177 Seconds
Run User SGP-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
85.8% Excellent
Memory 86.5
1-Core 123
2-Core 216
81% 142 Pts
4-Core 458
8-Core 738
73% 598 Pts
64-Core 887
55% 887 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 85.8%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Device(1D05 1044) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6519
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
6.35% Terrible
Lighting 6.9
Reflection 48
Parallax 7.4
6% 20.8 fps
MRender 10.4
Gravity 6.9
Splatting 10.7
8% 9.33 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.35%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 275GB-$100
84GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0CR060
SusWrite @10s intervals: 382 407 399 172 142 130 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
78.1% Very good
Read 406
Write 401
Mixed 348
SusWrite 272
80% 357 MB/s
4K Read 13.9
4K Write 81.6
4K Mixed 33.2
107% 42.9 MB/s
DQ Read 234
DQ Write 289
DQ Mixed 298
215% 274 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 8400 MHz clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (81st percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
82.9% Excellent
MC Read 31.9
MC Write 32.4
MC Mixed 23
83% 29.1 GB/s
SC Read 19.9
SC Write 35.9
SC Mixed 26.5
78% 27.4 GB/s
Latency 70.9
56% 70.9 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 82.9%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GK5CN5Z (APEX - 15) Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Aftershock GK5CN5Z (APEX - 15)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback