TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Dell OptiPlex 3070

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics5.97% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive140% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemDell OptiPlex 3070
MotherboardDell OptiPlex 3070  (all builds)
Memory0.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200206
Uptime12.3 Days
Run DateFeb 04 '22 at 04:45
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9500
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
92.3% Outstanding
Memory 91.7
1-Core 130
2-Core 265
90% 162 Pts
4-Core 502
8-Core 710
76% 606 Pts
64-Core 710
44% 710 Pts
Poor: 69% ↑
This bench: 92.3%
 Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)
Dell(1028 0930) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9864
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
5.97% Terrible
Lighting 6.9
Reflection 5.1
Parallax 7.8
6% 6.6 fps
MRender 5.9
Gravity 6.7
Splatting 10.6
7% 7.73 fps
Poor: 3% ↑
This bench: 5.97%
 Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Bc511 NVMe SK hynix 256GB
138GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 11002101 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 374 278 267 266 260 284 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
140% Outstanding
Read 964
Write 570
Mixed 648
SusWrite 288
137% 618 MB/s
4K Read 44.8
4K Write 77.1
4K Mixed 54.8
179% 58.9 MB/s
DQ Read 808
DQ Write 431
DQ Mixed 394
353% 545 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑
This bench: 140%
 Great: 177%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
400GB free
Firmware: KC49
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 104 102 105 108 105 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
58.8% Above average
Read 102
Write 103
Mixed 58.1
SusWrite 103
67% 91.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
127% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑
This bench: 58.8%
 Great: 88%
SanDisk Extreme Pro USB 3.1 256GB-$43
63GB free, PID 5588
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 231 157 290 136 319 225 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 19% Great: 122%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMA81GU6DJR8N-VK 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
38% Below average
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 10.6
MC Mixed 11.3
36% 12.5 GB/s
SC Read 10.3
SC Write 11.2
SC Mixed 10.9
31% 10.8 GB/s
Latency 64.7
62% 64.7 ns
Poor: 37% ↑
This bench: 38%
 Great: 48%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical OptiPlex 3070 Builds (Compare 2,596 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell OptiPlex 3070

CPU
Core i5-9500IntelBench 87%, 9,059 samples1,025x
Core i5-9500TIntelBench 77%, 2,730 samples502x
Core i3-9100TIntelBench 75%, 1,165 samples327x
GPU
UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)IntelBench 5%, 147,588 samples1,477x
UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i3)IntelBench 5%, 32,403 samples536x
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 65,338 samples140x
SSD
NVMe SK hynix 256GBBc511Bench 137%, 7,666 samples149x
NVMe KIOXIA 256GBKbg40zns256gBench 149%, 13,282 samples111x
NVMe Samsung 256GBPm991Bench 98%, 4,948 samples82x
RAM
8ATF1G64AZ-2G6E1 1x8GBUnknownBench 44%, 3,962 samples133x
HMA81GU6JJR8N-VK 1x8GBUnknownBench 44%, 2,734 samples132x
HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK 1x8GBUnknownBench 40%, 7,726 samples69x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback