Asus ROG MAXIMUS XII FORMULA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 214%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 109%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 224%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 107%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics204% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive270% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG MAXIMUS XII FORMULA  (all builds)
Memory55.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200721
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 03 '22 at 09:25
Run Duration359 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-10900KF-$255
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 5.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Memory 95.4
1-Core 160
2-Core 323
105% 193 Pts
4-Core 638
8-Core 1,086
105% 862 Pts
64-Core 2,007
124% 2,007 Pts
Poor: 88%
This bench: 107%
Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$879
Asus(1043 87AC) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 5350 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 511.23
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
204% Outstanding
Lighting 316
Reflection 266
Parallax 308
257% 297 fps
MRender 227
Gravity 247
Splatting 181
175% 218 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 204%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$170
221GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1264 1266 1294 1307 1278 1295 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
270% Outstanding
Read 1,520
Write 1,303
Mixed 1,199
SusWrite 1,284
298% 1,327 MB/s
4K Read 59.7
4K Write 154
4K Mixed 79.9
274% 97.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,184
DQ Write 893
DQ Mixed 1,001
759% 1,026 MB/s
Poor: 195%
This bench: 270%
Great: 393%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
178GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 454 453 463 466 467 469 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
122% Outstanding
Read 503
Write 482
Mixed 461
SusWrite 462
108% 477 MB/s
4K Read 41.9
4K Write 95.4
4K Mixed 55.2
185% 64.2 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 356
268% 359 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 122%
Great: 133%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
210GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 455 452 460 462 465 440 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
123% Outstanding
Read 484
Write 471
Mixed 406
SusWrite 456
102% 454 MB/s
4K Read 44.4
4K Write 93.8
4K Mixed 57.6
191% 65.3 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 356
267% 357 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 123%
Great: 134%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
28GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 484 477 480 480 478 392 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
123% Outstanding
Read 484
Write 476
Mixed 406
SusWrite 465
103% 458 MB/s
4K Read 44.2
4K Write 94.9
4K Mixed 56.4
190% 65.2 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 355
267% 358 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 123%
Great: 134%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
22GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,515
Write 2,340
Mixed 1,481
469% 2,112 MB/s
4K Read 67.4
4K Write 156
4K Mixed 90.2
300% 104 MB/s
DQ Read 1,267
DQ Write 987
DQ Mixed 1,094
827% 1,116 MB/s
Poor: 199% Great: 340%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$107
242GB free
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2392 2266 1731 1692 1694 1684 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
373% Outstanding
Read 2,589
Write 2,426
Mixed 2,330
SusWrite 1,910
521% 2,314 MB/s
4K Read 77
4K Write 159
4K Mixed 103
333% 113 MB/s
DQ Read 1,253
DQ Write 934
DQ Mixed 1075
808% 1,087 MB/s
Poor: 274%
This bench: 373%
Great: 488%
SST TS231UC-2 4TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 125 141 134 130 135 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
68.5% Good
Read 105
Write 116
Mixed 61.9
SusWrite 133
76% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 3.7
4K Mixed 0.3
127% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 68.5%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMT64GX4M4C3200C16 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
106% Outstanding
MC Read 39.1
MC Write 42.4
MC Mixed 32.6
109% 38 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 48.4
SC Mixed 31.5
89% 31.2 GB/s
Latency 56
71% 56 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 106%
Great: 136%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG MAXIMUS XII FORMULA Builds (Compare 1,302 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 205%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 219%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG MAXIMUS XII FORMULA - $500

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $2,334
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback