Gigabyte GA-Z68XP-UD3P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 65%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics103% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z68XP-UD3P  (all builds)
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120221
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 02 '22 at 22:21
Run Duration207 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175
Socket 1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
75.6% Very good
Memory 92.5
1-Core 104
2-Core 174
74% 123 Pts
4-Core 318
8-Core 504
50% 411 Pts
64-Core 512
32% 512 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 511.65
Performing below potential (61st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
103% Outstanding
Lighting 129
Reflection 142
Parallax 132
105% 134 fps
MRender 118
Gravity 135
Splatting 120
101% 124 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 103%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 500GB-$68
316GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 202 316 360 352 357 349 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 450
Write 393
Mixed 306
SusWrite 322
83% 368 MB/s
4K Read 36.2
4K Write 86.3
4K Mixed 44.4
157% 55.6 MB/s
DQ Read 390
DQ Write 326
DQ Mixed 353
266% 356 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 102%
Great: 130%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64
931GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 152 155 153 154 151 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
89% Excellent
Read 162
Write 141
Mixed 76.9
SusWrite 148
97% 132 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
199% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 89%
Great: 85%
WD WD120EMFZ-11A6JA0 12TB
5TB free
Firmware: 81.00A81
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 164 163 165 165 165 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
89.8% Excellent
Read 148
Write 151
Mixed 122
SusWrite 163
108% 146 MB/s
4K Read 3.7
4K Write 3.8
4K Mixed 2.5
502% 3.33 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 89.8%
Great: 115%
WD WD7500AACS-00D6B0 750GB
699GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 85 82 82 82 84 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
47.2% Average
Read 82.1
Write 82.3
Mixed 57.1
SusWrite 82.1
56% 75.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.8
154% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 46%
Seagate ST500LM012 HN-M500MBB 500GB
466GB free
Firmware: 2AR10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 106 105 106 105 106 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
57.6% Above average
Read 95.2
Write 51.2
Mixed 56.3
SusWrite 105
57% 77 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
145% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 59%
WD easystore 25FB 500GB
466GB free, PID 25fb
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 123 124 121 121 122 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
46.8% Average
Read 117
Write 76.4
Mixed 53.9
SusWrite 121
120% 92 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
63% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 56%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
59.8% Above average
MC Read 22
MC Write 21.3
MC Mixed 18.3
59% 20.5 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 18.7
SC Mixed 19.2
53% 18.5 GB/s
Latency 63.2
63% 63.2 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z68XP-UD3P Builds (Compare 278 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z68XP-UD3P

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $514
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback