Gigabyte GA-Z170M-D3H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics99.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive62.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte Z170M-D3H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z170M-D3H  (all builds)
Memory27 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170630
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateFeb 01 '22 at 18:50
Run Duration187 Seconds
Run User ISR-User
Background CPU 25%
Watch Gameplay: 2060S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
73.4% Very good
Memory 79
1-Core 105
2-Core 212
74% 132 Pts
4-Core 365
8-Core 603
59% 484 Pts
64-Core 623
39% 623 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$510
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 497.09
Performing below potential (46th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
99.3% Outstanding
Lighting 119
Reflection 112
Parallax 125
97% 119 fps
MRender 179
Gravity 111
Splatting 103
104% 131 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 99.3%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
60GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 608ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 126 134 118 109 103 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
62.5% Good
Read 245
Write 171
Mixed 236
SusWrite 119
43% 193 MB/s
4K Read 23.3
4K Write 93.5
4K Mixed 29.2
122% 48.7 MB/s
DQ Read 132
DQ Write 242
DQ Mixed 165
131% 180 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 85%
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$60
218GB free
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 714 56 55 76 55 56 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
159% Outstanding
Read 1,295
Write 901
Mixed 812
SusWrite 168
176% 794 MB/s
4K Read 48.9
4K Write 136
4K Mixed 65.8
230% 83.5 MB/s
DQ Read 329
DQ Write 816
DQ Mixed 221
269% 455 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 159%
Great: 209%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
765GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 164 164 166 166 166 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
90.5% Outstanding
Read 152
Write 134
Mixed 76.7
SusWrite 164
96% 132 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 90.5%
Great: 114%
Generic- Compact Flash 64GB
60GB free, PID 8461
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 113
Write 120
Mixed 56.9
120% 96.9 MB/s
4K Read 6.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 2.4
157% 3.47 MB/s
Poor: 47% Great: 49%
Generic- MicroSD/M2 128GB
119GB free, PID 8461
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 80 80 79 79 80 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
41.2% Average
Read 82.5
Write 51.7
Mixed 42.4
SusWrite 79.7
84% 64.1 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 4.3
282% 3.83 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905622-058.A00G 9905622-058.A00G 9905702-006.A00G 9905702-006.A00G 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
72.5% Very good
MC Read 26.1
MC Write 28.5
MC Mixed 22.8
74% 25.8 GB/s
SC Read 16.5
SC Write 28.3
SC Mixed 23
65% 22.6 GB/s
Latency 82.4
49% 82.4 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z170M-D3H-CF Builds (Compare 744 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z170M-D3H - $117

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $538
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback