Avell A62

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics48.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive99.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAvell A62  (all builds)
MotherboardAvell A62
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200610
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 01 '22 at 12:53
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
94.2% Outstanding
Memory 93.4
1-Core 146
2-Core 275
96% 172 Pts
4-Core 512
8-Core 776
80% 644 Pts
64-Core 1,028
64% 1,028 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 94.2%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-Ti (Mobile)
Device(1D05 1099) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.14.9676
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
48.8% Average
Lighting 62.8
Reflection 65.2
Parallax 57.4
51% 61.8 fps
MRender 60.7
Gravity 53.9
Splatting 49.3
44% 54.6 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteon CV8-8E512 512GB
425GB free (System drive)
Firmware: C292101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 278 186 290 300 304 301 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
99.3% Outstanding
Read 428
Write 322
Mixed 300
SusWrite 276
74% 332 MB/s
4K Read 35.7
4K Write 80.6
4K Mixed 49.7
160% 55.3 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 305
DQ Mixed 132
155% 269 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 99.3%
Great: 102%
SanDisk Ultra 123GB
112GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 43 38 33 36 35 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
30.3% Below average
Read 106
Write 45.7
Mixed 34.7
SusWrite 43.1
67% 57.5 MB/s
4K Read 5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 1.1
104% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 30.3%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TMA81GS6AFR8N-VKHC 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
45.7% Average
MC Read 17.4
MC Write 16
MC Mixed 11.3
43% 14.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 13.9
43% 15.1 GB/s
Latency 61.3
65% 61.3 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A62 Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat

System: Avell A62

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback