Performance Results


Gaming 16% Surfboard	Desktop 65% Battle cruiser	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	19.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	41.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2620 0-$77 3,540 User benchmarks, average bench 58% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	60.5% Good	Memory 78.6 1-Core 59.8 2-Core 117 53% 85.2 Pts	4-Core 230 8-Core 359 36% 295 Pts	64-Core 438 27% 438 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 60.5% Great: 63%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon RX 560-B 49,289 User benchmarks, average bench 20% XFX(1682 956D) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1196 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.1.1 Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	19.6% Very poor	Lighting 24.3 Reflection 27.2 Parallax 33.7 20% 28.4 fps	MRender 25.9 Gravity 26.2 Splatting 20 19% 24 fps
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 19.6% Great: 22%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD 512GB 512GB 6,819 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 214GB free (System drive) Firmware: FW200828 SusWrite @10s intervals: 223 85 36 60 7 7.6 MB/s Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	41.9% Average	Read 246 Write 230 Mixed 216 SusWrite 69.7 43% 190 MB/s	4K Read 22 4K Write 38.3 4K Mixed 11.7 69% 24 MB/s	DQ Read 177 DQ Write 175 DQ Mixed 17.7 57% 123 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 41.9% Great: 211%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Nanya NT4GC72B4NA1N NT4GC72B4NA1N M2L4G72CB4NA1 NT4GC72B4NA1N 16GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	45.8% Average	MC Read 18.3 MC Write 16.1 MC Mixed 15.4 47% 16.6 GB/s	SC Read 12.1 SC Write 8.8 SC Mixed 9.3 29% 10.1 GB/s	Latency 83.1 48% 83.1 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 45.8% Great: 84%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 29%

Raft

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 27%

Raft

RAM
M393B5170GB0- 4x4GBSamsungBench 89%, 2,611 samples	58x
36JSZF51272PZ 4x4GBMicronBench 66%, 485 samples	56x
HMT151R7BFR4C 4x4GBHynixBench 67%, 393 samples	31x

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $87

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16