Asus PRIME Z490-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 59%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics48.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive228% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus PRIME Z490-A  (all builds)
Memory15.3 GB free of 24 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210415
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateJan 28 '22 at 15:54
Run Duration273 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-10850K-$279
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Memory 96.2
1-Core 151
2-Core 302
100% 183 Pts
4-Core 598
8-Core 1,176
105% 887 Pts
64-Core 2,015
125% 2,015 Pts
Poor: 88%
This bench: 104%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
Sapphire(1DA2 E387) ≥ 4GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 27.20.22025.1006
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
48.5% Average
Lighting 62.2
Reflection 58.4
Parallax 79.8
51% 66.8 fps
MRender 62.3
Gravity 64.7
Splatting 40.7
44% 55.9 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$149
483GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 211070WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1486 833 628 482 474 497 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
228% Outstanding
Read 1,552
Write 1,713
Mixed 1,335
SusWrite 733
300% 1,333 MB/s
4K Read 48.5
4K Write 145
4K Mixed 69.8
240% 87.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,286
DQ Write 829
DQ Mixed 1017
769% 1,044 MB/s
Poor: 164%
This bench: 228%
Great: 276%
Alertseal 960GB 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: Q0526A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 325 397 410 404 404 404 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 506
Write 454
Mixed 411
SusWrite 391
99% 440 MB/s
4K Read 30.9
4K Write 83.5
4K Mixed 44.8
148% 53.1 MB/s
DQ Read 368
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 107
148% 271 MB/s
Poor: 89%
This bench: 106%
Great: 110%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
355GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 174 173 174 173 165 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
98.7% Outstanding
Read 173
Write 78.4
Mixed 80.5
SusWrite 171
92% 126 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
141% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 98.7%
Great: 113%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$45
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 204 206 206 206 206 205 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 53% Great: 106%
WD WD10EACS-00ZJB0 1TB
929GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 85 83 86 87 85 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
50.2% Above average
Read 89.4
Write 63.6
Mixed 55.3
SusWrite 85.4
54% 73.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
153% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 51%
Seagate ST3000DM003-1F216N 3TB
3TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 173 176 179 181 178 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
84.7% Excellent
Read 120
Write 134
Mixed 66.5
SusWrite 175
90% 124 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.7
150% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 84.7%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 3200 Patriot 4400 C19 Series DDR4 3200 24GB
3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
63.3% Good
MC Read 23.9
MC Write 22.8
MC Mixed 16.8
60% 21.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.3
SC Write 24.4
SC Mixed 20.9
60% 20.9 GB/s
Latency 53.2
75% 53.2 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 63.3%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME Z490-A Builds (Compare 7,385 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 143%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 142%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Z490-A - $265

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $1,142
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback