Biostar TH55B HD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics48.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive43.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardBiostar TH55B HD  (all builds)
Memory6.5 GB free of 10 GB @ 0 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101015
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 28 '22 at 15:20
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 34%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 650-$70
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
43.8% Average
Memory 61
1-Core 27.5
2-Core 66.9
34% 51.8 Pts
4-Core 153
8-Core 171
21% 162 Pts
64-Core 187
12% 187 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
48.3% Average
Lighting 58.7
Reflection 62.5
Parallax 57.1
48% 59.4 fps
MRender 62.9
Gravity 61.7
Splatting 57
49% 60.5 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
11GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 162 88 84 80 78 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
43.6% Average
Read 195
Write 190
Mixed 175
SusWrite 105
37% 166 MB/s
4K Read 20.2
4K Write 33.5
4K Mixed 28.1
84% 27.3 MB/s
DQ Read 35.7
DQ Write 81.6
DQ Mixed 47.8
40% 55 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 124%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$99
418GB free
Firmware: MX6OACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
56% Above average
Read 182
Write 13.2
Mixed 20.9
SusWrite 13.7
42% 57.4 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 56%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 10GB
0, 0, 0, 0 MHz
1024, 4096, 1024, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
28.3% Poor
MC Read 9.6
MC Write 8.7
MC Mixed 11.8
29% 10 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 5.7
20% 6.97 GB/s
Latency 125
32% 125 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 28.3%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TH55B HD Builds (Compare 42 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar TH55B HD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $130
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback