Biostar TH55B HD

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 21% Surfboard	Desktop 50% Yacht	Workstation 15% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	48.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Biostar TH55B HD (all builds)
Memory	7 GB free of 10 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20101015
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 28 '22 at 15:16
Run Duration	148 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	31%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 650-$70 42,063 User benchmarks, average bench 46% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	46.2% Average	Memory 67 1-Core 33.5 2-Core 57.5 36% 52.7 Pts	4-Core 143 8-Core 179 21% 161 Pts	64-Core 182 11% 182 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 46.2% Great: 53%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Zotac(19DA 2438) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	48.3% Average	Lighting 58.6 Reflection 61.3 Parallax 56.7 48% 58.9 fps	MRender 62.5 Gravity 61.8 Splatting 57.5 49% 60.6 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 48.3% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 11GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable		Read 203 Write 195 Mixed 194 44% 197 MB/s	4K Read 17.3 4K Write 26.6 4K Mixed 23.3 70% 22.4 MB/s	DQ Read 33.2 DQ Write 74.8 DQ Mixed 46.9 38% 51.6 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$96 74,038 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 418GB free Firmware: MX6OACF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	53.4% Above average	Read 172 Write 13.2 Mixed 20.9 SusWrite 13.7 40% 55.1 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.7 130% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 53.4% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 10GB 21,027 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 0, 0, 0, 0 MHz 1024, 4096, 1024, 4096 MB Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	29.3% Poor	MC Read 10.1 MC Write 8.8 MC Mixed 11.6 29% 10.2 GB/s	SC Read 8 SC Write 6.8 SC Mixed 8 22% 7.6 GB/s	Latency 109 37% 109 ns
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 29.3% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TH55B HD Builds (Compare 42 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 53%

Yacht

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar TH55B HD

CPU
Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples	10x
Core i3 530Intel $45Bench 46%, 16,724 samples	9x
Core i7 860Intel $320Bench 64%, 51,451 samples	9x

GPU
GTX 745 (OEM)Nvidia $60Bench 10%, 26,874 samples	11x
HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples	5x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	4x

SSD
SH00R240GB 240GBBench 52%, 1,121 samples	7x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	5x
SU750 512GBAdataBench 88%, 5,057 samples	3x

RAM
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	16x
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	8x
10GBUnknownBench 31%, 21,027 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $130

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16