Biostar TH55B HD

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics48.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardBiostar TH55B HD  (all builds)
Memory6.9 GB free of 10 GB @ 0 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101015
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 28 '22 at 14:54
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 31%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 650-$70
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
45.8% Average
Memory 65.6
1-Core 33.6
2-Core 69.5
37% 56.2 Pts
4-Core 149
8-Core 172
21% 160 Pts
64-Core 185
11% 185 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
48.4% Average
Lighting 59.2
Reflection 61.1
Parallax 55.8
48% 58.7 fps
MRender 62.4
Gravity 60
Splatting 57.4
49% 59.9 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
11GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 199
Write 192
Mixed 181
42% 191 MB/s
4K Read 17.8
4K Write 24.9
4K Mixed 25.2
72% 22.6 MB/s
DQ Read 33.9
DQ Write 76.9
DQ Mixed 47
38% 52.6 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$99
418GB free
Firmware: MX6OACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
50.7% Above average
Read 163
Write 13.2
Mixed 23.3
SusWrite 13.7
39% 53.3 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 10GB
0, 0, 0, 0 MHz
1024, 4096, 1024, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
28.6% Poor
MC Read 9.8
MC Write 8.8
MC Mixed 11
28% 9.87 GB/s
SC Read 8.1
SC Write 7
SC Mixed 8.3
22% 7.8 GB/s
Latency 112
36% 112 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 28.6%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TH55B HD Builds (Compare 42 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar TH55B HD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $130
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback