Asus B85M-G

Performance Results


Gaming 85% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 70% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	104% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	91.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Motherboard	Asus B85M-G (all builds)
Memory	20.7 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20180323
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jan 27 '22 at 13:28
Run Duration	216 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 2060S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1231 v3-$209 19,313 User benchmarks, average bench 73% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	81.1% Excellent	Memory 94 1-Core 107 2-Core 209 79% 136 Pts	4-Core 369 8-Core 542 57% 456 Pts	64-Core 555 34% 555 Pts
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 81.1% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$510 319,148 User benchmarks, average bench 100% Nvidia(10DE 1F06) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 472.12 Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	104% Outstanding	Lighting 126 Reflection 115 Parallax 130 103% 124 fps	MRender 189 Gravity 116 Splatting 106 108% 137 fps
Poor: 90% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 106%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$99 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 41GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0DB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 36 35 34 35 32 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	91.9% Outstanding	Read 496 Write 406 Mixed 380 SusWrite 61.2 75% 336 MB/s	4K Read 41.1 4K Write 96.6 4K Mixed 53.2 182% 63.6 MB/s	DQ Read 273 DQ Write 258 DQ Mixed 53.7 98% 195 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 91.9% Great: 118%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 215GB free Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 252 436 446 470 469 469 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	104% Outstanding	Read 508 Write 489 Mixed 346 SusWrite 424 99% 442 MB/s	4K Read 30.9 4K Write 106 4K Mixed 34.7 148% 57.3 MB/s	DQ Read 302 DQ Write 284 DQ Mixed 39.4 99% 208 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 133%
WD Black 640GB (2008)-$25 19,988 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 298GB free Firmware: 05.01D05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 3 3.2 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.3 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 32% Great: 65%
WD Black 500GB (2008)-$95 28,095 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 57GB free Firmware: 01.03B01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 32 33 32 33 33 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	34.2% Below average	Read 87 Write 32 Mixed 34.3 SusWrite 32.1 34% 46.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.6 111% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 34.2% Great: 69%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29 203,744 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 367GB free Firmware: 01.03B01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 36 36 36 36 36 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	23.7% Poor	Read 47.1 Write 23.9 Mixed 27.8 SusWrite 35.3 25% 33.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.6 105% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 23.7% Great: 69%
WD Elements 25A2 2TB 14 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 853GB free Firmware: 1021 SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 97 96 95 96 96 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	62.6% Good	Read 122 Write 91 Mixed 72.6 SusWrite 95 70% 95.2 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 4.1 4K Mixed 0.4 174% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 62.6% Great: 70%
Toshiba External USB 3.0 1TB 280 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 617GB free Firmware: 5438 SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 98 99 100 99 99 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	54.5% Above average	Read 96 Write 96.1 Mixed 35.5 SusWrite 93.8 58% 80.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.6 119% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 54.5% Great: 65%
WD Elements 25A2 1TB 29 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 68GB free Firmware: 1014 SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 55 55 54 53 54 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	39.2% Below average	Read 82.1 Write 79.8 Mixed 51.7 SusWrite 54.2 49% 66.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.9 164% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 39.2% Great: 68%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown F3-1600C9-8GAR 0420 F3-12800CL9-4GBRL 0420 F3-1600C9-8GAR 0420 F3-12800CL9-4GBRL 24GB 18 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	61.8% Good	MC Read 22.4 MC Write 22.2 MC Mixed 18.8 60% 21.1 GB/s	SC Read 16.6 SC Write 21 SC Mixed 19.9 55% 19.2 GB/s	Latency 59.8 67% 59.8 ns
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 61.8% Great: 71%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical B85M-G Builds (Compare 5,933 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus B85M-G - $80

CPU
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	968x
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	789x
Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples	535x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	481x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	406x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	372x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	261x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	164x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	153x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	158x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	127x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 27,462 samples	87x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $317

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16