Csl-computer 5802

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 162%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 149%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics172% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive238% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemCsl-computer 5802  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK TUF GAMING B550-PLUS (WI-FI)
Memory10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210713
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateJan 26 '22 at 16:19
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 6800-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
96.3% Outstanding
Memory 82.4
1-Core 152
2-Core 304
96% 180 Pts
4-Core 592
8-Core 895
92% 743 Pts
64-Core 1,112
69% 1,112 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 96.3%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6800-XT-$650
Asus(1043 04F2) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 22.1.2
Performing below potential (74th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
172% Outstanding
Lighting 214
Reflection 251
Parallax 432
175% 299 fps
MRender 376
Gravity 160
Splatting 269
218% 268 fps
Poor: 165%
This bench: 172%
Great: 178%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SNVS500G 500GB
237GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFK0N01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1473 517 551 402 494 560 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
238% Outstanding
Read 1,334
Write 1,827
Mixed 1,397
SusWrite 666
295% 1,306 MB/s
4K Read 56.4
4K Write 213
4K Mixed 84.2
306% 118 MB/s
DQ Read 1,282
DQ Write 935
DQ Mixed 1,123
835% 1,113 MB/s
Poor: 108%
This bench: 238%
Great: 244%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$32
400GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8R0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 129 140 137 140 141 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
80.3% Excellent
Read 144
Write 122
Mixed 31.9
SusWrite 135
78% 108 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
162% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 80.3%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3733C19D4/16GX 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3733 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
71.6% Very good
MC Read 27.2
MC Write 23.6
MC Mixed 23
70% 24.6 GB/s
SC Read 25.4
SC Write 26.5
SC Mixed 24.8
73% 25.6 GB/s
Latency 76.1
52% 76.1 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 71.6%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 5802 Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 162%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 147%
UFO

System: Csl-computer 5802

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $770
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback