HP hp compaq nx9105 (PG693EA#ABB)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 22%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
MemoryThe RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP hp compaq nx9105 (PG693EA#ABB)  (all builds)
MotherboardCompal 08A0
Memory0.5 GB free of 1.25 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20041223
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 13 '17 at 09:57
Run Duration98 Seconds
Run User BGR-User
Background CPU 47%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 64 3000+
Socket A, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
22% Poor
Memory 41.5
1-Core 14.4
2-Core 17.2
19% 24.4 Pts
4-Core 16.9
8-Core 20.8
2% 18.8 Pts
64-Core 22.6
1% 22.6 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 22%
Great: 43%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung HM160HC 160GB-$78
136GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LQ100-10 Max speed: UDMA 100 100 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
30.1% Below average
Read 51.2
Write 53.9
Mixed 51.8
39% 52.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.32
4K Write 0.57
4K Mixed 0.27
54% 0.38 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 30.1%
Great: 34%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1GB
null MHz
256, 1024 MB
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
6.28% Terrible
MC Read 2
MC Write 2.1
MC Mixed 1.8
6% 1.97 GB/s
SC Read 0.4
SC Write 1.3
SC Mixed 0.3
2% 0.67 GB/s
Latency 196
20% 196 ns
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.28%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback