Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	The RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium M processor 1.60GHz 163 User benchmarks, average bench 25% U1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	24.4% Poor	Memory 47.4 1-Core 6.7 2-Core 8.5 18% 20.9 Pts	4-Core 10.9 8-Core 11.9 2% 11.4 Pts	64-Core 13.8 1% 13.8 Pts
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 24.4% Great: 32%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung HM160HC 160GB-$78 157 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 134GB free (System drive) Firmware: LQ100-10 SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 12 9.8 9 21 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	6.58% Terrible	Read 10.6 Write 12 Mixed 8.3 SusWrite 12.1 8% 10.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.1 35% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 6.58% Great: 34%
SanDisk Ultra 64GB 5,745 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 57GB free, PID null, Sandisk Ultra SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.4 8.1 8.1 8.7 8 7.9 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	7.34% Terrible	Read 10.9 Write 5.2 Mixed 10.1 SusWrite 7.9 11% 8.52 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 1.1 84% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 7.34% Great: 39%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1GB 4,189 User benchmarks, average bench 13% null MHz 1024, 512 MB Performing below potential (25^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	6.48% Terrible	MC Read 1.9 MC Write 2.1 MC Mixed 1.7 5% 1.9 GB/s	SC Read 0.5 SC Write 1.6 SC Mixed 0.7 3% 0.93 GB/s	Latency 171 23% 171 ns
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 6.48% Great: 43%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16