Lenovo 80NT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.41% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive110% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemLenovo 80NT  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Lenovo ideapad 5
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150810
Uptime8.3 Days
Run DateJan 25 '22 at 17:16
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6500U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
58.1% Above average
Memory 73.1
1-Core 93.3
2-Core 165
64% 111 Pts
4-Core 251
8-Core 249
34% 250 Pts
64-Core 213
13% 213 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
Legend(17AA 3804) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8729
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
4.41% Terrible
Lighting 5.3
Reflection 5.2
Parallax 6.1
4% 5.53 fps
MRender 6.6
Gravity 5.2
Splatting 5.2
5% 5.67 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.41%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN256HAJQ-000L2 256GB
173GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MVT04L0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 352 301 238 295 301 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 488
Write 464
Mixed 378
SusWrite 298
91% 407 MB/s
4K Read 41.3
4K Write 94.1
4K Mixed 53.5
181% 63 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 334
DQ Mixed 356
267% 357 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 110%
Great: 111%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB
929GB free
Firmware: 2BA30001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 108 108 109 113 111 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
61.8% Good
Read 105
Write 75.6
Mixed 59.4
SusWrite 110
64% 87.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.7
145% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown S939A2SGS-ITR 0467 RMT3160ME68FAF1600 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
56.7% Above average
MC Read 20
MC Write 21.9
MC Mixed 18.3
57% 20.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 22.1
SC Mixed 18.8
50% 17.5 GB/s
Latency 94.4
42% 94.4 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 80NT Builds (Compare 598 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80NT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback