Asus PRIME X399-A

Performance Results


Gaming 127% UFO	Desktop 80% Battleship	Workstation 161% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	169% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X399-A (all builds)
Memory	54.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20210715
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 25 '22 at 15:47
Run Duration	529 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	11%

Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen TR 1950X-$225 23,641 User benchmarks, average bench 77% SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	74.2% Very good	Memory 61.8 1-Core 118 2-Core 237 74% 139 Pts	4-Core 463 8-Core 919 82% 691 Pts	64-Core 2,288 142% 2,288 Pts
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 74.2% Great: 85%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$899 424,051 User benchmarks, average bench 187% EVGA(3842 4897) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 511.17 Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	169% Outstanding	Lighting 243 Reflection 236 Parallax 242 198% 240 fps	MRender 286 Gravity 180 Splatting 157 164% 207 fps
Poor: 163% ↑ This bench: 169% Great: 202%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$170 93,447 User benchmarks, average bench 322% 43GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,407 Write 1,196 Mixed 1073 342% 1,559 MB/s	4K Read 48.2 4K Write 111 4K Mixed 62.3 212% 73.8 MB/s	DQ Read 764 DQ Write 464 DQ Mixed 583 443% 604 MB/s
Poor: 195% Great: 393%
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90 262,559 User benchmarks, average bench 251% 68GB free Firmware: 1B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,648 Write 2,035 Mixed 1,717 404% 1,800 MB/s	4K Read 50.2 4K Write 98.7 4K Mixed 65.3 212% 71.4 MB/s	DQ Read 782 DQ Write 535 DQ Mixed 667 496% 661 MB/s
Poor: 149% Great: 365%
Transcend SSD370S 512GB-$226 3,350 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 272GB free Firmware: O0919A SusWrite @10s intervals: 323 405 405 404 408 405 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	92.8% Outstanding	Read 487 Write 417 Mixed 316 SusWrite 392 90% 403 MB/s	4K Read 29 4K Write 56.8 4K Mixed 35 119% 40.3 MB/s	DQ Read 275 DQ Write 284 DQ Mixed 200 172% 253 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 92.8% Great: 111%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 205GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 336 316 316 315 315 314 MB/s Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	102% Outstanding	Read 485 Write 460 Mixed 401 SusWrite 319 94% 416 MB/s	4K Read 36.1 4K Write 70.1 4K Mixed 45.3 150% 50.5 MB/s	DQ Read 377 DQ Write 352 DQ Mixed 356 270% 362 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 124%
Seagate BUP Slim BK 1TB 18,390 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 160GB free Firmware: 0108 SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 113 111 116 117 118 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	47% Average	Read 48.5 Write 63.3 Mixed 84.6 SusWrite 114 58% 77.6 MB/s	4K Read 2.2 4K Write 3.1 4K Mixed 0.8 238% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 47% Great: 63%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2016)-$112 34,353 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 862GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 104 106 107 106 106 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	82.1% Excellent	Read 183 Write 152 Mixed 75.3 SusWrite 103 94% 128 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.7 144% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 82.1% Great: 105%
WD easystore 264D 12TB 733 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 4.5TB free, PID 264d Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 172 173 177 181 171 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	78% Very good	Read 147 Write 150 Mixed 96.4 SusWrite 173 193% 142 MB/s	4K Read 2.4 4K Write 6 4K Mixed 1.4 261% 3.27 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 78% Great: 103%
WD Game Drive 4TB 3,751 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 355GB free, PID 262f Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 111 109 109 109 105 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	52% Above average	Read 104 Write 105 Mixed 69.7 SusWrite 107 131% 96.6 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 4.3 4K Mixed 0.9 181% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 52% Great: 65%
ASMT ASM1352R-Fast 4TB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 120% 784GB free, PID 1356 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 650 640 657 672 668 679 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 18% Great: 227%
WD Game Drive 4TB 3,751 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 973GB free, PID 262f Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 78 77 77 76 77 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	49.8% Average	Read 89.9 Write 82 Mixed 61.8 SusWrite 77.3 104% 77.8 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 6.4 4K Mixed 0.7 245% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 49.8% Great: 65%
ASMT 2115 8TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 983GB free, PID ab38 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 100 101 107 109 101 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	48.9% Average	Read 75.4 Write 83.9 Mixed 73 SusWrite 102 116% 83.5 MB/s	4K Read 1.8 4K Write 5 4K Mixed 0.5 194% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 48.9% Great: 70%
WD My Passport 25E1 2TB 20,154 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 549GB free, PID 25e1 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 95 94 97 98 97 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	36.5% Below average	Read 67.6 Write 67 Mixed 44.2 SusWrite 96.4 95% 68.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 36.5% Great: 61%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 128GB 148 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 117GB free, PID 0748 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 81 79 81 80 80 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	40.6% Average	Read 88.6 Write 78.6 Mixed 54.4 SusWrite 80.2 100% 75.4 MB/s	4K Read 5.8 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 4 256% 4.23 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 40.6% Great: 43%
Samsung SSD 860 EVO 500G 500GB 40 User benchmarks, average bench 225% 285GB free, PID 55aa Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 436 432 440 445 446 360 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	283% Outstanding	Read 448 Write 427 Mixed 409 SusWrite 427 582% 428 MB/s	4K Read 29.4 4K Write 38.5 4K Mixed 31.9 2,504% 33.3 MB/s	DQ Read 33.9 DQ Write 49.3 DQ Mixed 39.4 3,143% 40.9 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 283% Great: 376%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GB 2,983 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 4 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	119% Outstanding	MC Read 48.1 MC Write 45 MC Mixed 48.9 135% 47.3 GB/s	SC Read 14.3 SC Write 30.4 SC Mixed 20.4 62% 21.7 GB/s	Latency 122 33% 122 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 119% Great: 131%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X399-A Builds (Compare 531 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 99%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 120%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X399-A

CPU
Ryzen TR 1950XAMD $225Bench 77%, 23,641 samples	187x
Ryzen TR 1920XAMD $800Bench 78%, 10,440 samples	125x
Ryzen TR 2950XAMD $1,075Bench 81%, 10,169 samples	75x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	47x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	33x
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	27x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $86Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	24x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $152Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	22x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	22x

RAM
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	11x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GBCorsairBench 96%, 10,311 samples	10x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $103Bench 88%, 110,884 samples	10x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 81% - Excellent

Total price: $909

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16