Asrock Q77M vPro

Performance Results


Gaming 17% Surfboard	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 15% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	15.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	85.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	ASROCK Q77M VPro
Motherboard	Asrock Q77M vPro (all builds)
Memory	28.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20180313
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 25 '22 at 13:04
Run Duration	210 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$297 278,207 User benchmarks, average bench 69% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	76% Very good	Memory 86.9 1-Core 102 2-Core 201 75% 130 Pts	4-Core 352 8-Core 506 54% 429 Pts	64-Core 509 32% 509 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 76% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92 309,423 User benchmarks, average bench 17% Asus(1043 84BB) CLim: 1346 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 471.68 Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	15.7% Very poor	Lighting 21.8 Reflection 18.9 Parallax 21.5 18% 20.7 fps	MRender 25.3 Gravity 23.3 Splatting 0.1 12% 16.2 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 15.7% Great: 19%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 240GB-$40 53,931 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 168GB free (System drive) Firmware: X41320RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 283 202 192 192 187 192 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	85.3% Excellent	Read 487 Write 460 Mixed 337 SusWrite 208 84% 373 MB/s	4K Read 33.2 4K Write 55.8 4K Mixed 39 130% 42.7 MB/s	DQ Read 285 DQ Write 285 DQ Mixed 251 198% 274 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 85.3% Great: 101%
Lexar 256GB SSD 256GB 12,615 User benchmarks, average bench 111% 148GB free Firmware: H190117H SusWrite @10s intervals: 331 396 422 398 393 251 MB/s Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	93.7% Outstanding	Read 485 Write 462 Mixed 448 SusWrite 365 99% 440 MB/s	4K Read 35.1 4K Write 61.8 4K Mixed 40.3 138% 45.7 MB/s	DQ Read 278 DQ Write 136 DQ Mixed 134 119% 183 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 93.7% Great: 240%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$24 574,344 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 298GB free Firmware: KC48 SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 107 108 107 107 108 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	66.6% Good	Read 126 Write 122 Mixed 62.3 SusWrite 106 76% 104 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.8 138% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 66.6% Great: 88%
ICY BOX BOX IB-3620 2TB 81 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 979GB free, PID 2773 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 13 12 12 13 13 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	23.9% Poor	Read 120 Write 100 Mixed 53.8 SusWrite 12.5 87% 71.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.5 60% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 23.9% Great: 57%
ICY BOX BOX IB-3620 2TB 81 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 818GB free, PID 2773 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 94 98 94 92 97 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	35.5% Below average	Read 85.7 Write 99 Mixed 51.8 SusWrite 92.5 112% 82.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.7 57% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 35.5% Great: 57%
Seagate Expansion Desk 1TB 142 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 334GB free, PID 3312 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 92 95 93 91 95 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	37.6% Below average	Read 90 Write 95.3 Mixed 51.8 SusWrite 90.8 111% 82 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.9 85% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 37.6% Great: 76%
WD My Book ES 500GB 39 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 224GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 23 23 23 23 24 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	17.8% Very poor	Read 31.7 Write 28 Mixed 27.3 SusWrite 22.8 37% 27.5 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1 126% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 17.8% Great: 22%
JMicron Generic 1TB 376 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 522GB free, PID 0567 SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 136 138 136 134 137 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	60.3% Good	Read 150 Write 111 Mixed 119 SusWrite 133 171% 128 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 3 4K Mixed 0.9 136% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 60.3% Great: 222%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5403-465.A00LF 029E CMY16GX3M2A1866C9 99U5403-465.A00LF 029E CMY16GX3M2A1866C9 32GB 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	58.1% Above average	MC Read 21.5 MC Write 20.4 MC Mixed 18.6 58% 20.2 GB/s	SC Read 16.8 SC Write 17.8 SC Mixed 18.3 50% 17.6 GB/s	Latency 70.6 57% 70.6 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Q77M vPro Builds (Compare 83 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 32%

Sail boat

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 26%

Raft

Motherboard: Asrock Q77M vPro

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	24x
Core i7-2600Intel $187Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	11x
Core i5-3570KIntel $136Bench 68%, 185,516 samples	10x

GPU
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	10x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	7x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	5x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	4x
MX500 500GBCrucial $45Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	4x
AS350 128GBApacerBench 65%, 2,222 samples	3x

RAM
99U5471-040.A00LF 1x8GBKingstonBench 27%, 2,012 samples	4x
9905403-439.A00LF 9905403-437.A01LF 12GBKingstonBench 49%, 3 samples	3x
KHX1866C10D3/8G KHX1600C9D3/8GX KHX1866C10D3/8G KHX2400C11D3/8GX 32GBKingstonBench 52%, 3 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 65% - Good

Total price: $507

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16