Asus CS-B

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics64.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive96.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus CS-B  (all builds)
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150309
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 24 '22 at 13:35
Run Duration191 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
84.3% Excellent
Memory 89
1-Core 122
2-Core 231
84% 148 Pts
4-Core 430
8-Core 639
66% 534 Pts
64-Core 625
39% 625 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 84.3%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560
Nvidia(10DE 1151) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 511.23
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
64.1% Good
Lighting 91.4
Reflection 106
Parallax 94.1
74% 97 fps
MRender 92.8
Gravity 91.2
Splatting 0.3
44% 61.4 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteon IT LCS-128L9S-HP 128GB
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 9C08
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 290 307 308 301 309 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
96.3% Outstanding
Read 483
Write 336
Mixed 274
SusWrite 280
77% 343 MB/s
4K Read 34.5
4K Write 82.9
4K Mixed 40.3
148% 52.6 MB/s
DQ Read 349
DQ Write 299
DQ Mixed 195
182% 281 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 96.3%
Great: 98%
Spcc Solid State Disk 128GB
75GB free
Firmware: SN07985
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 308 314 319 320 314 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
99% Outstanding
Read 480
Write 402
Mixed 388
SusWrite 291
88% 390 MB/s
4K Read 38.2
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 43.2
170% 63 MB/s
DQ Read 164
DQ Write 287
DQ Mixed 140
131% 197 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 99%
Great: 93%
Adata SU630 480GB
33GB free
Firmware: P190710d
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 313 325 333 315 298 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 417
Write 384
Mixed 387
SusWrite 293
83% 370 MB/s
4K Read 41.1
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 48.9
178% 63.7 MB/s
DQ Read 239
DQ Write 280
DQ Mixed 308
218% 276 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 101%
Great: 99%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24
458GB free
Firmware: 19.01H19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 118 118 117 119 119 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
53.7% Above average
Read 71.8
Write 67.1
Mixed 50.5
SusWrite 115
56% 76.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
106% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 69%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
483GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 154 154 154 154 154 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
96.9% Outstanding
Read 189
Write 177
Mixed 106
SusWrite 149
114% 155 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 1.1
234% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 96.9%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451U6BFR8C-PB HMT351U6CFR8C-PB HMT451U6BFR8C-PB HMT351U6EFR8C-PB 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
58.4% Above average
MC Read 21.5
MC Write 21.1
MC Mixed 16.7
56% 19.8 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 22.9
SC Mixed 20.2
57% 19.9 GB/s
Latency 68.5
58% 68.5 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CS-B Builds (Compare 435 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus CS-B

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $293
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback