To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics17.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive67.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardTo Be Filled By O.E.M.  (all builds)
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120920
Uptime8.1 Days
Run DateJan 23 '22 at 19:19
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User BGR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E31225
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
73.4% Very good
Memory 91.8
1-Core 85
2-Core 168
69% 115 Pts
4-Core 318
8-Core 329
43% 324 Pts
64-Core 332
20% 332 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Zotac(19DA 288A) 2GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 466.11
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
17.5% Very poor
Lighting 21.7
Reflection 18.3
Parallax 22.8
18% 20.9 fps
MRender 24.9
Gravity 23.2
Splatting 16.8
17% 21.6 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 17.5%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
140GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 217 233 230 228 232 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
67.4% Good
Read 254
Write 241
Mixed 226
SusWrite 221
53% 235 MB/s
4K Read 28.2
4K Write 46.8
4K Mixed 34.6
112% 36.5 MB/s
DQ Read 203
DQ Write 191
DQ Mixed 197
148% 197 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 67.4%
Great: 124%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$48
27GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 41 41 41 43 42 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
45.9% Average
Read 118
Write 66.8
Mixed 62.6
SusWrite 41.7
54% 72.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.7
145% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 108%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$40
404GB free
Firmware: JP4OA3EA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 115 117 115 115 118 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
66.7% Good
Read 118
Write 118
Mixed 57.3
SusWrite 115
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 74%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$23
25GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 152 152 153 154 153 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
80.5% Excellent
Read 129
Write 118
Mixed 89.2
SusWrite 151
90% 122 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
229% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 80.5%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown E30112A 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
52.8% Above average
MC Read 18.1
MC Write 19.4
MC Mixed 16.5
51% 18 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 16.5
SC Mixed 16.6
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 64.5
62% 64.5 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,598 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $23Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback