Microelectronics G315

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics19% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive327% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicroelectronics G315  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK PRIME Z370-P
Memory27.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210113
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 23 '22 at 13:48
Run Duration252 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8600K-$125
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Memory 94
1-Core 151
2-Core 302
100% 183 Pts
4-Core 604
8-Core 882
93% 743 Pts
64-Core 899
56% 899 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 103%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 2138 MHz, MLim: 2079 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 511.23
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
19% Very poor
Lighting 7.5
Reflection 0.6
Parallax 0.5
6% 2.87 fps
MRender 94.8
Gravity 89.4
Splatting 0.5
44% 61.6 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 19%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$93
230GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1809 1583 1603 1559 1487 1424 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
327% Outstanding
Read 1,989
Write 2,187
Mixed 1,162
SusWrite 1,577
389% 1,729 MB/s
4K Read 55.9
4K Write 168
4K Mixed 76.4
272% 100 MB/s
DQ Read 1,707
DQ Write 1,326
DQ Mixed 1,445
1,100% 1,492 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 327%
Great: 410%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
160GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 491 492 490 492 491 492 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
131% Outstanding
Read 506
Write 491
Mixed 442
SusWrite 491
109% 482 MB/s
4K Read 44.5
4K Write 117
4K Mixed 61.2
208% 74.1 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 346
DQ Mixed 360
272% 363 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 131%
Great: 133%
Intel SSDSCKKW256G8 256GB
37GB free
Firmware: LHF002C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 366 269 267 268 269 271 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
121% Outstanding
Read 515
Write 373
Mixed 421
SusWrite 285
89% 398 MB/s
4K Read 49.8
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 66.8
219% 75.2 MB/s
DQ Read 306
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 249
208% 299 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 121%
Great: 113%
Seagate IronWolf 4TB (2016)-$90
2.5TB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 151 158 155 158 157 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
87.7% Excellent
Read 152
Write 143
Mixed 75.6
SusWrite 154
96% 131 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
145% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 87.7%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4-3000C16-8GISB Corsair CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 F4-3000C16-8GISB Corsair CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 32GB
3000, 3000, 3000, 3000 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
102% Outstanding
MC Read 38.6
MC Write 39.9
MC Mixed 30.3
104% 36.3 GB/s
SC Read 20.4
SC Write 43.6
SC Mixed 29.7
89% 31.2 GB/s
Latency 59.7
67% 59.7 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 102%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G315 Builds (Compare 123 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer

System: Microelectronics G315

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $439
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback