Microelectronics G315

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 78%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics80.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive366% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicroelectronics G315  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK PRIME Z370-P
Memory27.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210113
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 23 '22 at 02:06
Run Duration234 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 39%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8600K-$125
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Memory 93.9
1-Core 152
2-Core 302
100% 183 Pts
4-Core 604
8-Core 861
92% 733 Pts
64-Core 903
56% 903 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 103%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2102 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 511.23
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
80.4% Excellent
Lighting 98.2
Reflection 110
Parallax 112
80% 107 fps
MRender 101
Gravity 99.1
Splatting 98
81% 99.4 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$93
232GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1828 1672 1655 1597 1600 1385 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
366% Outstanding
Read 2,557
Write 2,175
Mixed 1,321
SusWrite 1,623
429% 1,919 MB/s
4K Read 67.6
4K Write 173
4K Mixed 94.9
316% 112 MB/s
DQ Read 1,702
DQ Write 1,314
DQ Mixed 1,447
1,099% 1,488 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 366%
Great: 410%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
161GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 492 492 492 489 490 490 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
131% Outstanding
Read 504
Write 486
Mixed 436
SusWrite 491
108% 479 MB/s
4K Read 45
4K Write 121
4K Mixed 60
209% 75.3 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 362
273% 364 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 131%
Great: 133%
Intel SSDSCKKW256G8 256GB
37GB free
Firmware: LHF002C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 359 261 261 263 262 262 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
122% Outstanding
Read 516
Write 338
Mixed 433
SusWrite 278
88% 391 MB/s
4K Read 50.3
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 67.4
222% 77 MB/s
DQ Read 308
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 248
208% 300 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 122%
Great: 113%
Seagate IronWolf 4TB (2016)-$90
2.5TB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 156 152 154 159 156 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
85.2% Excellent
Read 144
Write 135
Mixed 69.8
SusWrite 153
92% 125 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
155% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 85.2%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4-3000C16-8GISB Corsair CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 F4-3000C16-8GISB Corsair CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 32GB
3000, 3000, 3000, 3000 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
103% Outstanding
MC Read 39.2
MC Write 39.9
MC Mixed 31
105% 36.7 GB/s
SC Read 21
SC Write 43.6
SC Mixed 29.8
90% 31.5 GB/s
Latency 60.1
66% 60.1 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 103%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G315 Builds (Compare 123 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer

System: Microelectronics G315

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $439
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback