Alienware Aurora

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.02% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive70.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAlienware Aurora  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware 04VWF2
Memory27.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100406
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 23 '22 at 10:45
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 960-$220
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
75.6% Very good
Memory 94.3
1-Core 84.3
2-Core 167
70% 115 Pts
4-Core 316
8-Core 408
46% 362 Pts
64-Core 402
25% 402 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 260-$250
Nvidia(10DE 0738) 1.8GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 8.16.11.9120
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
5.02% Terrible
Lighting 7
Reflection 10.7
Parallax 3.3
6% 7 fps
MRender 6
Gravity 5.4
Splatting 2.9
4% 4.77 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 5.02%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 500GB-$62
393GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 206 214 213 212 221 220 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
70.2% Very good
Read 251
Write 238
Mixed 235
SusWrite 214
53% 235 MB/s
4K Read 30.9
4K Write 53.5
4K Mixed 37.1
123% 40.5 MB/s
DQ Read 204
DQ Write 192
DQ Mixed 197
148% 197 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 130%
Sandisk Extreme SSD 250GB
52GB free
Firmware: 1012
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 12 12 12 12 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
9.31% Terrible
Read 24.4
Write 23.4
Mixed 22.8
SusWrite 11.7
5% 20.6 MB/s
4K Read 7
4K Write 7.7
4K Mixed 7.5
24% 7.4 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 9.31%
Great: 77%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
923GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 145 141 139 141 141 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
81.4% Excellent
Read 142
Write 41
Mixed 71.2
SusWrite 142
73% 98.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 1.1
221% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 81.4%
Great: 75%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
888GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 145 137 143 143 139 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
72.6% Very good
Read 110
Write 67.3
Mixed 73.3
SusWrite 142
72% 98.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.2
219% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 75%
BUFFALO HD-PCTU3 2TB
783GB free, PID 01de
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 11 11 11 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
11.2% Very poor
Read 24
Write 24.2
Mixed 21.7
SusWrite 10.8
27% 20.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.2%
Great: 42%
SanDisk Ultra 252GB
101GB free, PID 5590
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9 8.9 9 8.9 9.1 9.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
10.3% Very poor
Read 23.9
Write 17.9
Mixed 16.9
SusWrite 9
22% 16.9 MB/s
4K Read 4.9
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 2.6
147% 2.9 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.3%
Great: 27%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 6 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
49% Average
MC Read 18.5
MC Write 16.3
MC Mixed 14.9
47% 16.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.6
SC Write 13.3
SC Mixed 15.5
39% 13.8 GB/s
Latency 58.9
68% 58.9 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 49%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aurora Builds (Compare 506 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

System: Alienware Aurora

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $249
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback