Asus H87M-E

Performance Results


Gaming 37% Jet ski	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 29% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	51.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	44.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 22 months ago.

Motherboard	Asus H87M-E (all builds)
Memory	13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150618
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 23 '22 at 07:37
Run Duration	147 Seconds
Run User	NZL-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4440-$128 81,111 User benchmarks, average bench 61% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	69.9% Good	Memory 83.2 1-Core 92 2-Core 179 69% 118 Pts	4-Core 328 8-Core 333 44% 330 Pts	64-Core 351 22% 351 Pts
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 69.9% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% EVGA(3842 2974) CLim: 1506 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 511.23 Performing below potential (76^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	51.4% Above average	Lighting 62.9 Reflection 106 Parallax 65.7 51% 78.1 fps	MRender 69.2 Gravity 65 Splatting 57.6 52% 63.9 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 51.4% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 167GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFK62C3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 241 149 148 104 97 82 MB/s Performing below potential (18^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	44.9% Average	Read 194 Write 152 Mixed 158 SusWrite 137 36% 160 MB/s	4K Read 26.6 4K Write 39 4K Mixed 22.3 90% 29.3 MB/s	DQ Read 23.1 DQ Write 47.7 DQ Mixed 27.1 23% 32.6 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 44.9% Great: 100%
Kingston SNVS500 500GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 225GB free Firmware: EDFK SusWrite @10s intervals: 260 335 292 267 317 246 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	75.5% Very good	Read 318 Write 320 Mixed 305 SusWrite 286 69% 307 MB/s	4K Read 15.5 4K Write 97.1 4K Mixed 29.3 112% 47.3 MB/s	DQ Read 112 DQ Write 375 DQ Mixed 197 164% 228 MB/s
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 75.5% Great: 76%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CT51264BA160BJ.C8F 1315 CT51264BA160BJ.C8F 1315 CT102464BD160B.M16 16GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096, 8192 MB Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	34.7% Below average	MC Read 11.6 MC Write 11.9 MC Mixed 10.1 32% 11.2 GB/s	SC Read 10.9 SC Write 11.8 SC Mixed 11.4 32% 11.4 GB/s	Latency 74.9 53% 74.9 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 34.7% Great: 39%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H87M-E Builds (Compare 856 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H87M-E - $129

CPU
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	196x
Core i5-4570Intel $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples	128x
Core i5-4440Intel $128Bench 61%, 81,111 samples	77x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	87x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	45x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	40x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	44x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	25x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	24x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	35x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	25x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	16x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $247

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16