HP Compaq 6200 Pro MT PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.61% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive76.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Compaq 6200 Pro MT PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1497
Memory9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111110
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJan 22 '22 at 12:56
Run Duration195 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400-$250
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
66.9% Good
Memory 84.6
1-Core 83.2
2-Core 164
66% 111 Pts
4-Core 287
8-Core 280
38% 284 Pts
64-Core 284
18% 284 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7450
Sapphire(174B 3000) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
1.61% Terrible
Lighting 2.1
Reflection 2.6
Parallax 2
2% 2.23 fps
MRender 1.8
Gravity 1.6
Splatting 1.8
1% 1.73 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.61%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Team T2535T240G 240GB
82GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R1001A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 404 265 42 38 45 49 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
76.8% Very good
Read 478
Write 410
Mixed 396
SusWrite 141
80% 356 MB/s
4K Read 32.7
4K Write 72.1
4K Mixed 28.1
124% 44.3 MB/s
DQ Read 212
DQ Write 325
DQ Mixed 47.9
98% 195 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 76.8%
Great: 93%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$20
85GB free
Firmware: HP73
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 95 96 97 98 97 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
54.6% Above average
Read 94
Write 50.5
Mixed 57.5
SusWrite 96.4
55% 74.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.7
124% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 88%
General USB Flash Disk 8GB
7GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.3 7.7 7.7 7.7 7.8 7.7 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
5.22% Terrible
Read 19
Write 7
Mixed 6.8
SusWrite 7.4
12% 10.1 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.1
17% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.22%
Great: 8%
VendorCo ProductCode 64GB
58GB free, PID 5678
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7 7.2 7.2 11 7.5 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
5.68% Terrible
Read 18.2
Write 17
Mixed 7.8
SusWrite 7.9
16% 12.7 MB/s
4K Read 3
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.2
25% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.68%
Great: 10%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 Atermiter 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 Atermiter 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
44.2% Average
MC Read 14.1
MC Write 16.4
MC Mixed 14.4
43% 15 GB/s
SC Read 12.6
SC Write 14.1
SC Mixed 13.5
38% 13.4 GB/s
Latency 72.4
55% 72.4 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq 6200 Pro MT PC Builds (Compare 1,144 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 6200 Pro MT PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $278
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback