MSI X399 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B09)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics42.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive167% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B09
MotherboardMSI X399 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B09)  (all builds)
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.5 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170821
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 12 '17 at 04:46
Run Duration264 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 1950X-$225
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
81.9% Excellent
Memory 74.4
1-Core 122
2-Core 243
80% 146 Pts
4-Core 479
8-Core 945
84% 712 Pts
64-Core 2664
165% 2664 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 81.9%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$499
CLim: 2164 MHz, MLim: 3002 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 385.41
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
42.8% Average
Lighting 7.97
Reflection 150
Parallax 128
6% 95.5 fps
MRender 123
Gravity 174
Splatting 123
113% 140 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid Array 1 1.5TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 8.2
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
279% Outstanding
Read 2,717
Write 2,339
Mixed 2,246
542% 2,434 MB/s
4K Read 21.6
4K Write 37.5
4K Mixed 22.2
81% 27.1 MB/s
DQ Read 18.7
DQ Write 117
DQ Mixed 57.7
48% 64.5 MB/s
Poor: 131%
This bench: 279%
Great: 336%
OCZ INTR EPID 3700 480GB
287GB free
Firmware: 0501
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
54% Above average
Read 375
Write 388
Mixed 343
82% 369 MB/s
4K Read 14.7
4K Write 21.7
4K Mixed 8.85
45% 15.1 MB/s
DQ Read 44.6
DQ Write 43.4
DQ Mixed 21.7
22% 36.6 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 54%
Great: 85%
Toshiba OCZ RD400 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$70
232GB free
Firmware: 57CZ Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
186% Outstanding
Read 1,778
Write 1,070
Mixed 1,292
305% 1,380 MB/s
4K Read 28.8
4K Write 87.6
4K Mixed 40.5
142% 52.3 MB/s
DQ Read 138
DQ Write 131
DQ Mixed 66
68% 111 MB/s
Poor: 116%
This bench: 186%
Great: 242%
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139
239GB free
Firmware: 2B6Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
259% Outstanding
Read 2,354
Write 1,969
Mixed 2,087
476% 2,137 MB/s
4K Read 33.8
4K Write 71.9
4K Mixed 35
134% 46.9 MB/s
DQ Read 30.8
DQ Write 121
DQ Mixed 34.3
38% 62.1 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 259%
Great: 353%
Toshiba OCZ RD400 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$4
160GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 57CZ Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
167% Outstanding
Read 1,783
Write 1,042
Mixed 1,275
302% 1,367 MB/s
4K Read 23.6
4K Write 80.8
4K Mixed 17.8
101% 40.7 MB/s
DQ Read 25.7
DQ Write 70.3
DQ Mixed 20.6
24% 38.9 MB/s
Poor: 122%
This bench: 167%
Great: 219%
Freebsd CTLDISK 81GB
49GB free
Firmware: 0001
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 54% Great: 90%
Patriot Memory 124GB
22GB free, PID 6000
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
52.4% Above average
Read 275
Write 35.8
Mixed 33.1
97% 115 MB/s
4K Read 8.53
4K Write 0.85
4K Mixed 1.31
105% 3.56 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3400 C16 4x4GB
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 3466 MHz clocked @ 1733 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
182% Outstanding
MC Read 72.2
MC Write 77.8
MC Mixed 67.4
207% 72.5 GB/s
SC Read 20.8
SC Write 46.7
SC Mixed 29.8
93% 32.4 GB/s
Latency 91.7
44% 91.7 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 182%
Great: 142%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X399 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B09) Builds (Compare 266 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 120%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI X399 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B09)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $808
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback