Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X513EP_X513EP

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics21% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive141% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X513EP_X513EP  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X513EP
Memory1.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210727
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 21 '22 at 06:48
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User LKA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1165G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
82.7% Excellent
Memory 75.3
1-Core 163
2-Core 309
97% 182 Pts
4-Core 484
8-Core 713
75% 598 Pts
64-Core 669
41% 669 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 82.7%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Asus(1043 1E4F) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9268
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
21% Poor
Lighting 25.1
Reflection 18.1
Parallax 29.7
20% 24.3 fps
MRender 24.1
Gravity 38.1
Splatting 20.7
22% 27.6 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 21%
Great: 20%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-256G-1002 256GB
123GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 21106000 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 273 260 214 212 216 191 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
141% Outstanding
Read 1,041
Write 845
Mixed 842
SusWrite 228
165% 739 MB/s
4K Read 46
4K Write 121
4K Mixed 52.3
201% 73 MB/s
DQ Read 680
DQ Write 415
DQ Mixed 551
409% 549 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 141%
Great: 171%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
326GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 81 78 75 77 77 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
36.7% Below average
Read 50.6
Write 76.4
Mixed 59.2
SusWrite 77.1
49% 65.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.4
106% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CWE 2x4GB
2 of 8 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
74.5% Very good
MC Read 28.4
MC Write 29
MC Mixed 21.6
75% 26.3 GB/s
SC Read 18.7
SC Write 36.3
SC Mixed 19.7
71% 24.9 GB/s
Latency 89.7
45% 89.7 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X513EP_X513EP Builds (Compare 190 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X513EP_X513EP

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback