HP 810-370st

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics88% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemHP 810-370st  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON 2ACE
Memory26.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140430
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 19 '22 at 18:21
Run Duration248 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 31%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4930K-$100
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
73.6% Very good
Memory 82.7
1-Core 97.7
2-Core 179
70% 120 Pts
4-Core 348
8-Core 600
57% 474 Pts
64-Core 729
45% 729 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 2138 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 511.23
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
88% Excellent
Lighting 110
Reflection 121
Parallax 109
89% 113 fps
MRender 96.1
Gravity 106
Splatting 108
85% 103 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 88%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$137
540GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 881 480 480 475 479 481 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 81% Great: 133%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$60
1.5TB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 151 160 159 153 157 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
77.4% Very good
Read 114
Write 168
Mixed 42.4
SusWrite 156
87% 120 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.5
124% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 77.4%
Great: 108%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
1TB free
Firmware: HP51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 177 181 181 182 177 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 182
Write 129
Mixed 64.1
SusWrite 179
101% 138 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 104%
Great: 114%
Seagate Expansion+ Desk 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 9401
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 30 30 30 30 30 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
18.1% Very poor
Read 32.9
Write 28.2
Mixed 25.3
SusWrite 29.7
22% 29 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 18.1%
Great: 97%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT102464BD160B.C1 CT102464BD160B.C1 Hynix HMT41GU6BFR8A-PB Hynix HMT41GU6BFR8A-PB 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
94.2% Outstanding
MC Read 38.8
MC Write 37
MC Mixed 36.2
107% 37.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 12
SC Mixed 11.5
37% 13 GB/s
Latency 75.7
53% 75.7 ns
Poor: 94%
This bench: 94.2%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 810-370st Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: HP 810-370st

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $212
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback