HP 810-370st

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics78.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive115% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (77%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP 810-370st  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON 2ACE
Memory27.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140430
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 04 '18 at 22:37
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 77%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4930K-$100
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
80.6% Excellent
Memory 87.4
1-Core 101
2-Core 188
73% 125 Pts
4-Core 398
8-Core 573
61% 486 Pts
64-Core 752
46% 752 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 80.6%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
78.8% Very good
Lighting 97.2
Reflection 111
Parallax 92.9
79% 100 fps
MRender 96.1
Gravity 92.7
Splatting 96.7
78% 95.2 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 78.8%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$137
75GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 459 442 424 477 476 477 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 506
Write 469
Mixed 452
SusWrite 459
106% 472 MB/s
4K Read 37.5
4K Write 82.1
4K Mixed 49.4
164% 56.3 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 341
DQ Mixed 358
270% 362 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 115%
Great: 133%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$60
1.5TB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 157 157 156 162 159 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
81.6% Excellent
Read 126
Write 183
Mixed 23.5
SusWrite 158
88% 123 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
144% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 81.6%
Great: 108%
Seagate Expansion+ Desk 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 9401
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 122 121 125 124 126 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
85% Excellent
Read 173
Write 94.5
Mixed 68.2
SusWrite 123
84% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
134% 1 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 85%
Great: 97%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT102464BD160B.C1 CT102464BD160B.C1 Hynix HMT41GU6BFR8A-PB Hynix HMT41GU6BFR8A-PB 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
94.7% Outstanding
MC Read 39
MC Write 37
MC Mixed 35.9
107% 37.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 13
SC Mixed 12.7
38% 13.4 GB/s
Latency 70.1
57% 70.1 ns
Poor: 94%
This bench: 94.7%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 810-370st Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: HP 810-370st

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $212
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback