Lenovo 10MLCTO1WW

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics0.55% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive62.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 10MLCTO1WW  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 3106
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190430
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 19 '22 at 03:22
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU 36%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7400-$70
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
63.7% Good
Memory 77.9
1-Core 105
2-Core 163
68% 115 Pts
4-Core 273
8-Core 364
40% 318 Pts
64-Core 384
24% 384 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)
Legend(17AA 3106) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Relative performance (0th percentile)
0.55% Terrible
Lighting 0.1
Reflection 4
Parallax 8.3
0% 4.13 fps
MRender 0.3
Gravity 5.5
Splatting 0.1
2% 1.97 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 0.55%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD9TB8W256G1001 256GB
170GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X6105101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 195 200 198 198 186 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
62.3% Good
Read 334
Write 154
Mixed 225
SusWrite 186
50% 225 MB/s
4K Read 20.2
4K Write 46.1
4K Mixed 19.9
80% 28.7 MB/s
DQ Read 348
DQ Write 247
DQ Mixed 239
194% 278 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 97%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CRC 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
38.1% Below average
MC Read 14.5
MC Write 12.7
MC Mixed 11
36% 12.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.5
SC Write 13.9
SC Mixed 11.6
35% 12.3 GB/s
Latency 84.5
47% 84.5 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 38.1%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 10MLCTO1WW Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 10MLCTO1WW

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $60
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback