Lenovo 782449U

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics14.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemLenovo 782449U  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140610
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 18 '22 at 15:08
Run Duration279 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$136
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
73% Very good
Memory 89.2
1-Core 93.8
2-Core 173
71% 119 Pts
4-Core 309
8-Core 437
47% 373 Pts
64-Core 454
28% 454 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 73%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Gigabyte(1458 375C) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 497.29
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
14.5% Very poor
Lighting 18
Reflection 17.9
Parallax 18.8
15% 18.2 fps
MRender 15.8
Gravity 19.2
Splatting 17.3
14% 17.4 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.5%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSK 960GB
862GB free
Firmware: 0212
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.3 8.2 8.1 8 8 8 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
8.46% Terrible
Read 31.4
Write 26
Mixed 29.2
SusWrite 8.1
5% 23.7 MB/s
4K Read 6.3
4K Write 7.1
4K Mixed 6.4
22% 6.6 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 8.46%
Great: 75%
WD WD10EAVS-00D7B1 1TB
389GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 30 32 25 27 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
17.2% Very poor
Read 31.9
Write 29
Mixed 15.4
SusWrite 27.9
19% 26.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.1
34% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 17.2%
Great: 51%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$25
362GB free
Firmware: CC6B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 118 117 114 119 119 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
69.1% Good
Read 123
Write 119
Mixed 65.9
SusWrite 118
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1.2
200% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 70%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2010)-$35
219GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 72 72 70 71 72 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
40.2% Average
Read 70.4
Write 75.1
Mixed 49
SusWrite 69.6
49% 66 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
141% 1 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 50%
Jmicron Tech 750GB
49GB free
Firmware: 0508
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.3 8.3 8.3 8.3 8.4 8.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
12.1% Very poor
Read 33.4
Write 28.6
Mixed 21.7
SusWrite 8.3
17% 23 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
98% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.1%
Great: 63%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB
56GB free
Firmware: 3202
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.3 8.4 8.3 8.3 8.3 8.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
11.7% Very poor
Read 31.8
Write 28.1
Mixed 28.5
SusWrite 8.3
18% 24.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
158% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 11.7%
Great: 59%
Toshiba MK3275GSX 320GB
62GB free
Firmware: 3202
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.2 8.3 8.3 8.2 8.3 8.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
11.4% Very poor
Read 30.9
Write 28.4
Mixed 23.3
SusWrite 8.3
17% 22.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
119% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.4%
Great: 46%
SAC SAC-Click free 809GB
315GB free, PID 0202
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 17 17 17 17 17 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
13.2% Very poor
Read 18.3
Write 15.7
Mixed 16
SusWrite 16.8
22% 16.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
101% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.2%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5673FH0-CH9 M378B5673FH0-CH9 RMR1810KD58E8F1333 RMR1810KC58E8F1333 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
47.3% Average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 16.6
MC Mixed 14.2
45% 15.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 16.5
SC Mixed 16
45% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 68.3
59% 68.3 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 782449U Builds (Compare 17 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 782449U

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $136
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback