Lenovo 782449U

Performance Results


Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	13.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Lenovo 782449U (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO
Memory	4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140610
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Jan 04 '22 at 07:00
Run Duration	256 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	24%

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2600-$188 185,630 User benchmarks, average bench 67% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	66.7% Good	Memory 82.5 1-Core 88.7 2-Core 157 65% 109 Pts	4-Core 276 8-Core 423 43% 349 Pts	64-Core 414 26% 414 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 66.7% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030 185,384 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Gigabyte(1458 375C) 2GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	13.9% Very poor	Lighting 16.8 Reflection 15.7 Parallax 0.3 14% 10.9 fps	MRender 15.6 Gravity 19.1 Splatting 17.1 14% 17.3 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 13.9% Great: 15%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
SSK 960GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 894GB free Firmware: 0212 SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.3 8.3 8.2 8.2 8.3 8.2 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	9.07% Terrible	Read 32.9 Write 28.2 Mixed 29.6 SusWrite 8.2 6% 24.7 MB/s	4K Read 6.7 4K Write 7.7 4K Mixed 7 23% 7.13 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 9.07% Great: 75%
WD WD10EAVS-00D7B1 1TB 26,179 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 881GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 71 74 59 61 77 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	44.7% Average	Read 85.5 Write 87.7 Mixed 52.1 SusWrite 69.8 54% 73.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.9 162% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 44.7% Great: 51%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$36 203,102 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 462GB free Firmware: CC6B SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 122 124 125 124 124 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	70.1% Very good	Read 121 Write 110 Mixed 63.6 SusWrite 123 77% 105 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 1.1 187% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 70.1% Great: 70%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2010)-$35 32,229 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 220GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 71 72 72 71 71 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	40.9% Average	Read 70.7 Write 68.7 Mixed 47.7 SusWrite 71.5 48% 64.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.9 150% 1 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 40.9% Great: 50%
Jmicron Tech 750GB 209 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 39GB free Firmware: 0508 SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.4 8.3 8.3 8.3 8.3 8.3 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	11.1% Very poor	Read 30 Write 29.8 Mixed 21.7 SusWrite 8.3 17% 22.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.6 109% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 11.1% Great: 63%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB 266,123 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 58GB free Firmware: 3202 SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.2 8.3 8.3 8.3 8.4 8.7 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	12.1% Very poor	Read 33.3 Write 29.5 Mixed 28.2 SusWrite 8.3 19% 24.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.9 156% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 12.1% Great: 59%
Toshiba MK3275GSX 320GB 4,670 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 29GB free Firmware: 3202 SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.3 8.2 8.3 8.3 8.4 8.3 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	11.8% Very poor	Read 32.4 Write 29.4 Mixed 22.6 SusWrite 8.3 17% 23.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 130% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 11.8% Great: 46%
SAC SAC-Click free 809GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 194GB free, PID 0202 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 18 18 18 17 17 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	13.5% Very poor	Read 19 Write 16.7 Mixed 17.2 SusWrite 17.4 24% 17.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.8 104% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 13.5% Great: 22%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5673FH0-CH9 M378B5673FH0-CH9 RMR1810KD58E8F1333 RMR1810KC58E8F1333 8GB 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	45.1% Average	MC Read 15.5 MC Write 15.8 MC Mixed 14.2 43% 15.2 GB/s	SC Read 12.7 SC Write 15.9 SC Mixed 15.3 42% 14.6 GB/s	Latency 76.1 53% 76.1 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 782449U Builds (Compare 17 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 14%

Tree trunk

Desktop 70%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 782449U

CPU
Core i7-2600Intel $188Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	11x
Core i3-2100Intel $49Bench 51%, 63,701 samples	5x
Xeon E31280IntelBench 73%, 472 samples	1x

GPU
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	12x
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	2x
GeForce 8400 GSNvidiaBench 1%, 18,254 samples	1x

SSD
SSK 960GBBench 68%, 5 samples	2x
MX300 525GBCrucial $150Bench 86%, 105,037 samples	1x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	1x

RAM
RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C10 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 51%, 4,160 samples	6x
M378B5673FH0-CH9 M378B5673FH0-CH9 Hynix HMT125U6BFR8C-H9 Hynix HMT125U6BFR8C-H9 8GBSamsungBench 49%, 2 samples	2x
ACR16D3LU1NGG/4G 4x4GBKingstonBench 47%, 102 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 75% - Very good

Total price: $188

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16