Lenovo 782449U

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics14.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 782449U  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140610
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 18 '22 at 04:50
Run Duration270 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$191
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
73.5% Very good
Memory 90
1-Core 94.4
2-Core 187
73% 124 Pts
4-Core 309
8-Core 460
48% 384 Pts
64-Core 448
28% 448 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Gigabyte(1458 375C) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 497.29
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
14.3% Very poor
Lighting 17.5
Reflection 18.9
Parallax 21.2
14% 19.2 fps
MRender 15.8
Gravity 19.3
Splatting 17.3
14% 17.5 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.3%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSK 960GB
862GB free
Firmware: 0212
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.3 8.2 8.1 8.2 8.2 8.2 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
8.89% Terrible
Read 32.3
Write 29
Mixed 30.1
SusWrite 8.2
6% 24.9 MB/s
4K Read 6.4
4K Write 7.8
4K Mixed 6.9
23% 7.03 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 8.89%
Great: 75%
WD WD10EAVS-00D7B1 1TB
402GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 57 52 53 47 45 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
37.1% Below average
Read 76.9
Write 74.2
Mixed 46
SusWrite 51.9
46% 62.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 37.1%
Great: 51%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$25
362GB free
Firmware: CC6B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 118 118 119 115 120 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
68.3% Good
Read 119
Write 113
Mixed 65
SusWrite 119
76% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1.3
207% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 70%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2010)-$35
219GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 73 71 71 71 72 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
40.8% Average
Read 70.7
Write 75.5
Mixed 50
SusWrite 71.3
49% 66.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 50%
Jmicron Tech 750GB
49GB free
Firmware: 0508
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.3 8.3 8.2 8.3 8.2 8.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
11.8% Very poor
Read 32.3
Write 30.1
Mixed 21.6
SusWrite 8.3
17% 23.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
98% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 11.8%
Great: 63%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB
56GB free
Firmware: 3202
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.3 8.2 8.2 8.4 8.3 8.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
11.3% Very poor
Read 30.5
Write 30.3
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 8.3
18% 24.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
149% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 11.3%
Great: 59%
Toshiba MK3275GSX 320GB
62GB free
Firmware: 3202
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.2 8.1 8.2 8.4 8.2 8.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
12.2% Very poor
Read 33.6
Write 28
Mixed 23.7
SusWrite 8.2
17% 23.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
128% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 12.2%
Great: 46%
SAC SAC-Click free 809GB
315GB free, PID 0202
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 17 17 17 16 17 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
12.8% Very poor
Read 17.7
Write 14.9
Mixed 16.5
SusWrite 16.8
22% 16.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
98% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.8%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5673FH0-CH9 M378B5673FH0-CH9 RMR1810KD58E8F1333 RMR1810KC58E8F1333 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
48.7% Average
MC Read 16.9
MC Write 16.9
MC Mixed 15.1
47% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 16.8
SC Mixed 15.8
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 67.2
60% 67.2 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 782449U Builds (Compare 17 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 782449U

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $191
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback