Lenovo 90RB001SUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive345% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemLenovo 90RB001SUS  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 3716
Memory55.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display5431 x 2263 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210903
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateJan 16 '22 at 13:05
Run Duration262 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5700G-$125
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
94.6% Outstanding
Memory 79.5
1-Core 167
2-Core 318
100% 188 Pts
4-Core 588
8-Core 1,037
98% 813 Pts
64-Core 1,523
94% 1,523 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 94.6%
Great: 105%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL21T0HCLR-00BL7 1TB
776GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 8L2QGXA7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1997 2062 2051 2049 2040 2043 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
345% Outstanding
Read 2,428
Write 2,177
Mixed 2,140
SusWrite 2,040
494% 2,196 MB/s
4K Read 60.4
4K Write 125
4K Mixed 79.4
260% 88.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,085
DQ Write 822
DQ Mixed 995
733% 967 MB/s
Poor: 204%
This bench: 345%
Great: 454%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
393GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 487 447 469 473 444 349 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 497
Write 479
Mixed 436
SusWrite 445
105% 464 MB/s
4K Read 42.2
4K Write 91.3
4K Mixed 54.2
182% 62.6 MB/s
DQ Read 389
DQ Write 366
DQ Mixed 374
282% 376 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 120%
Great: 129%
Pcie SSD 1TB
774GB free
Firmware: EDFM00.5 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1114 426 171 22 128 228 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
160% Outstanding
Read 1,122
Write 860
Mixed 969
SusWrite 348
184% 825 MB/s
4K Read 33.8
4K Write 160
4K Mixed 52.4
203% 82.2 MB/s
DQ Read 492
DQ Write 920
DQ Mixed 582
477% 665 MB/s
Poor: 112%
This bench: 160%
Great: 284%
CT2000BX500SSD1 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: M6CR030
SusWrite @10s intervals: 467 259 41 43 35 316 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
79.1% Very good
Read 504
Write 454
Mixed 397
SusWrite 194
87% 387 MB/s
4K Read 26.2
4K Write 89.4
4K Mixed 26.2
121% 47.3 MB/s
DQ Read 149
DQ Write 348
DQ Mixed 40.8
90% 179 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 79.1%
Great: 99%
Seagate ST3000DM003-1F216N 3TB
2TB free
Firmware: CC54
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 148 145 149 149 150 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
81.3% Excellent
Read 136
Write 108
Mixed 77.3
SusWrite 148
86% 117 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 81.3%
Great: 99%
Seagate Backup+ Desk 4TB
3TB free, PID a0a4
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 160 160 160 158 160 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
60.1% Good
Read 150
Write 128
Mixed 74.1
SusWrite 158
170% 128 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
63% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 LMKUFG68AHFHD-32A TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 LMKUFG68AHFHD-32A 64GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
87.1% Excellent
MC Read 30.8
MC Write 29.2
MC Mixed 29.6
85% 29.9 GB/s
SC Read 27.2
SC Write 43.5
SC Mixed 30.4
96% 33.7 GB/s
Latency 81.5
49% 81.5 ns
Poor: 78%
This bench: 87.1%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 90RB001SUS Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 92%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 93%
Nuclear submarine

System: Lenovo 90RB001SUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $391
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback