Lenovo 90RB001SUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive331% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 90RB001SUS  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 3716
Memory55.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display5431 x 2263 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210903
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 16 '22 at 14:42
Run Duration240 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5700G-$160
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
96.7% Outstanding
Memory 78
1-Core 166
2-Core 305
98% 183 Pts
4-Core 618
8-Core 1,034
101% 826 Pts
64-Core 1,489
92% 1,489 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 96.7%
Great: 105%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL21T0HCLR-00BL7 1TB
776GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 8L2QGXA7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1856 1859 1831 1743 1798 1855 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
331% Outstanding
Read 2,425
Write 2,133
Mixed 2,125
SusWrite 1,824
478% 2,127 MB/s
4K Read 60.2
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 79.5
258% 87.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,051
DQ Write 827
DQ Mixed 969
717% 949 MB/s
Poor: 204%
This bench: 331%
Great: 454%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
393GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 486 488 488 485 435 343 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 505
Write 461
Mixed 431
SusWrite 454
104% 463 MB/s
4K Read 33.8
4K Write 90.5
4K Mixed 48.5
161% 57.6 MB/s
DQ Read 390
DQ Write 364
DQ Mixed 373
281% 376 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 115%
Great: 129%
Pcie SSD 1TB
774GB free
Firmware: EDFM00.5 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1091 234 235 234 232 229 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
161% Outstanding
Read 1103
Write 747
Mixed 972
SusWrite 376
179% 799 MB/s
4K Read 33.5
4K Write 162
4K Mixed 52.5
204% 82.7 MB/s
DQ Read 493
DQ Write 914
DQ Mixed 585
478% 664 MB/s
Poor: 112%
This bench: 161%
Great: 284%
CT2000BX500SSD1 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: M6CR030
SusWrite @10s intervals: 472 479 474 458 467 482 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 489
Write 16.7
Mixed 19.7
SusWrite 472
55% 249 MB/s
4K Read 41.7
4K Write 85.4
4K Mixed 26.5
142% 51.2 MB/s
DQ Read 156
DQ Write 346
DQ Mixed 41.1
91% 181 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 101%
Great: 99%
Seagate ST3000DM003-1F216N 3TB
2TB free
Firmware: CC54
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 148 148 149 149 150 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
80.1% Excellent
Read 133
Write 103
Mixed 75.8
SusWrite 147
84% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 80.1%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 LMKUFG68AHFHD-32A TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 LMKUFG68AHFHD-32A 64GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
98.9% Outstanding
MC Read 36.2
MC Write 35.8
MC Mixed 32.9
100% 35 GB/s
SC Read 27.7
SC Write 44.3
SC Mixed 32.3
99% 34.8 GB/s
Latency 84.2
48% 84.2 ns
Poor: 78%
This bench: 98.9%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 90RB001SUS Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 92%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 93%
Nuclear submarine

System: Lenovo 90RB001SUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $410
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback