Jingsha/kllisre X99 Beta 2.0407

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 92%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 92%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics117% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive260% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (50%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemJingsha/kllisre X99 Beta 2.0407  (all builds)
MotherboardJingsha/Kllisre X99 Beta 2.0407
Memory26.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191031
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateJan 15 '22 at 03:59
Run Duration236 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 50%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
73.8% Very good
Memory 77.2
1-Core 93.7
2-Core 188
68% 120 Pts
4-Core 378
8-Core 714
65% 546 Pts
64-Core 1,117
69% 1,117 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 497.29
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
117% Outstanding
Lighting 152
Reflection 153
Parallax 150
124% 152 fps
MRender 187
Gravity 132
Splatting 120
117% 146 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 117%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
224GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1040 683 666 658 656 657 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
260% Outstanding
Read 2,424
Write 2,310
Mixed 1,744
SusWrite 727
403% 1,802 MB/s
4K Read 54.9
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 73.9
244% 84.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,099
DQ Write 837
DQ Mixed 951
716% 962 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 260%
Great: 355%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$155
1.5TB free
Firmware: 2B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2062 2074 2062 2064 2096 2056 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
329% Outstanding
Read 2,152
Write 2,022
Mixed 1,956
SusWrite 2,069
462% 2,050 MB/s
4K Read 55.6
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 72.6
233% 77.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,082
DQ Write 871
DQ Mixed 1,000
742% 984 MB/s
Poor: 283%
This bench: 329%
Great: 526%
WD Purple Surveillance 2TB (2017)-$70
38GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 140 141 138 137 137 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
77.8% Very good
Read 132
Write 132
Mixed 69.9
SusWrite 139
87% 118 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
197% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 77.8%
Great: 104%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
627GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 162 163 162 162 162 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
95.4% Outstanding
Read 171
Write 166
Mixed 85.3
SusWrite 162
107% 146 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
139% 1 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 95.4%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8ATF1G64HZ-2G3B2 8ATF1G64AZ-2G6H1 8ATF1G64HZ-2G3B2 8ATF1G64HZ-2G3B2 32GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
110% Outstanding
MC Read 50.6
MC Write 41.1
MC Mixed 39.4
125% 43.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.5
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 17.9
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 85.8
47% 85.8 ns
Poor: 106%
This bench: 110%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99 Beta 2.0407 Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 105%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 110%
UFO

System: Jingsha/kllisre X99 Beta 2.0407

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $500
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback