Asus M4A89GTD-PRO/USB3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics29.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive42.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M4A89GTD-PRO/USB3  (all builds)
Memory5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120711
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 14 '22 at 15:56
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 965-$144
AM3, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
59.2% Above average
Memory 84.6
1-Core 50.9
2-Core 100
51% 78.6 Pts
4-Core 198
8-Core 199
27% 199 Pts
64-Core 202
12% 202 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.5% Poor
Lighting 38.9
Reflection 34.8
Parallax 35.9
32% 36.5 fps
MRender 33.9
Gravity 36.6
Splatting 24.4
25% 31.6 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 29.5%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial C300-CTFDDAC128MAG 128GB
94GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0006
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 84 91 99 109 107 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
42.8% Average
Read 286
Write 128
Mixed 102
SusWrite 98.2
34% 153 MB/s
4K Read 11.5
4K Write 52.8
4K Mixed 10.5
59% 24.9 MB/s
DQ Read 233
DQ Write 130
DQ Mixed 87.3
90% 150 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 62%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 593GB
392GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 46 32 30 22 43 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
11.5% Very poor
Read 94.9
Write 105
Mixed 58.8
SusWrite 32.2
16% 72.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 27.8
4K Mixed 1.4
17% 9.83 MB/s
DQ Read 4.8
DQ Write 38.2
DQ Mixed 1.2
7% 14.7 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 11.5%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CM3X2G1600C8 CMX4GX3M2A1600C7 CM3X2G1600C8 CMX4GX3M2A1600C7 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
36.1% Below average
MC Read 15.6
MC Write 7.6
MC Mixed 14
35% 12.4 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 10.7
24% 8.43 GB/s
Latency 72.4
55% 72.4 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 36.1%
Great: 36%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M4A89GTD-PRO/USB3 Builds (Compare 236 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M4A89GTD-PRO/USB3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $268
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback