Asus M4A89GTD-PRO/USB3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics8.67% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive43% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M4A89GTD-PRO/USB3  (all builds)
Memory6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120711
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJan 15 '22 at 16:19
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 965-$144
AM3, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
56.2% Above average
Memory 78
1-Core 50.5
2-Core 102
49% 76.9 Pts
4-Core 201
8-Core 201
27% 201 Pts
64-Core 199
12% 199 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
8.67% Terrible
Lighting 0.1
Reflection 27.4
Parallax 37.7
0% 21.7 fps
MRender 33.7
Gravity 36.7
Splatting 24.9
25% 31.8 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 8.67%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial C300-CTFDDAC128MAG 128GB
90GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0006
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 116 103 111 110 104 MB/s
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
43% Average
Read 273
Write 134
Mixed 174
SusWrite 110
38% 173 MB/s
4K Read 17
4K Write 40.2
4K Mixed 9.7
60% 22.3 MB/s
DQ Read 235
DQ Write 131
DQ Mixed 90
92% 152 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 43%
Great: 62%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 593GB
400GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 39 39 38 35 38 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
12.3% Very poor
Read 119
Write 106
Mixed 55.1
SusWrite 38.9
18% 79.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 22.7
4K Mixed 1.5
14% 8.17 MB/s
DQ Read 4.3
DQ Write 43.3
DQ Mixed 0.1
7% 15.9 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 12.3%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CM3X2G1600C8 CMX4GX3M2A1600C7 CM3X2G1600C8 CMX4GX3M2A1600C7 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
35.6% Below average
MC Read 15.8
MC Write 7.6
MC Mixed 13.9
36% 12.4 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 10.3
24% 8.4 GB/s
Latency 84.3
47% 84.3 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 36%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M4A89GTD-PRO/USB3 Builds (Compare 236 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M4A89GTD-PRO/USB3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $268
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback