Asus TUF GAMING B450-PLUS II

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive310% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B450-PLUS II  (all builds)
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200914
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 13 '22 at 18:00
Run Duration192 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X-$275
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
90.7% Outstanding
Memory 81
1-Core 138
2-Core 266
88% 162 Pts
4-Core 538
8-Core 951
90% 745 Pts
64-Core 1,450
90% 1,450 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 90.7%
Great: 96%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
313GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 830 828 826 816 796 803 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
310% Outstanding
Read 2536
Write 2,492
Mixed 1,913
SusWrite 816
434% 1,939 MB/s
4K Read 71.6
4K Write 182
4K Mixed 100
333% 118 MB/s
DQ Read 1389
DQ Write 1,096
DQ Mixed 1048
837% 1,178 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 310%
Great: 340%
Sandisk PLUS 1000GB
622GB free
Firmware: UH4504RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 248 221 210 206 213 213 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
59.9% Above average
Read 456
Write 398
Mixed 319
SusWrite 218
78% 348 MB/s
4K Read 22.8
4K Write 46.5
4K Mixed 15.6
79% 28.3 MB/s
DQ Read 118
DQ Write 101
DQ Mixed 33.2
46% 84.4 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CM4X8GD3200C16K2E 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
83.3% Excellent
MC Read 32.6
MC Write 23.9
MC Mixed 32.5
85% 29.7 GB/s
SC Read 25.8
SC Write 23
SC Mixed 31
76% 26.6 GB/s
Latency 78.7
51% 78.7 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 83.3%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING B450-PLUS II Builds (Compare 2,278 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 82%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B450-PLUS II

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $476
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback