Schenkertechnologiesgmbh XMG NEO (M19, RTX 2060)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics70% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive229% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemSchenkertechnologiesgmbh XMG NEO (M19, RTX 2060)  (all builds)
MotherboardSchenkerTechnologiesGmbH XMG_GK5CP0Z_GK7CP0S_M19
Memory25.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben, ,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190918
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 12 '22 at 21:20
Run Duration376 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
74.8% Very good
Memory 80
1-Core 113
2-Core 175
72% 123 Pts
4-Core 383
8-Core 503
56% 443 Pts
64-Core 652
40% 652 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 87%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060 (Mobile)
Device(1D05 105F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 497.29
Performing below potential (43rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
70% Good
Lighting 83
Reflection 92.2
Parallax 85.8
68% 87 fps
MRender 124
Gravity 77.4
Splatting 79
74% 93.4 fps
Poor: 49%
This bench: 70%
Great: 83%
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Device(1D05 105F) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9805
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
5.99% Terrible
Lighting 6.3
Reflection 9.3
Parallax 7.6
5% 7.73 fps
MRender 10.3
Gravity 5.8
Splatting 11.3
8% 9.13 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.99%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90
496GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1611 1431 1357 1403 1455 1409 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
229% Outstanding
Read 901
Write 2,098
Mixed 914
SusWrite 1,444
305% 1,339 MB/s
4K Read 55.1
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 71.6
230% 76.7 MB/s
DQ Read 878
DQ Write 608
DQ Mixed 714
541% 734 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 229%
Great: 410%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90
129GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1646 1360 1397 1369 1113 1161 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
230% Outstanding
Read 868
Write 1,388
Mixed 863
SusWrite 1,341
253% 1115 MB/s
4K Read 58.5
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 74.8
245% 82.4 MB/s
DQ Read 966
DQ Write 689
DQ Mixed 790
600% 815 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 230%
Great: 410%
Seagate Expansion HDD 4TB
2TB free
Firmware: 1901
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 116 115 116 115 115 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
56.9% Above average
Read 83.7
Write 118
Mixed 65.6
SusWrite 114
70% 95.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.5
117% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 89%
SDHC Card 32GB
29GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 21 21 20 21 20 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
29.3% Poor
Read 80.7
Write 20.6
Mixed 36.5
SusWrite 20.4
44% 39.5 MB/s
4K Read 10
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 4.3
302% 5.93 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 29.3%
Great: 33%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905630-058.A00G 9905703-008.A00G 32GB
2667, 2667 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
83% Excellent
MC Read 29.8
MC Write 32.5
MC Mixed 26.2
84% 29.5 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 36.7
SC Mixed 25.5
77% 26.8 GB/s
Latency 80.6
50% 80.6 ns
Poor: 83%
This bench: 83%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical XMG NEO (M19, RTX 2060) Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 51%
Yacht

System: Schenkertechnologiesgmbh XMG NEO (M19, RTX 2060)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $159
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback