DELL Studio XPS 435T

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics43.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive62.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDELL Studio XPS 435T  (all builds)
MotherboardDELL 0X501H
Memory44.2 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090206
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJan 12 '22 at 16:40
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 940-$150
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
63% Good
Memory 83.4
1-Core 75.7
2-Core 144
61% 101 Pts
4-Core 232
8-Core 360
36% 296 Pts
64-Core 351
22% 351 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 63%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
CLim: 2205 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 497.29
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
43.4% Average
Lighting 56.4
Reflection 58.2
Parallax 49.4
46% 54.7 fps
MRender 41.5
Gravity 51.6
Splatting 47.3
38% 46.8 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$90
175GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 203 209 205 150 152 154 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
62.2% Good
Read 249
Write 215
Mixed 228
SusWrite 179
49% 218 MB/s
4K Read 23.2
4K Write 47.6
4K Mixed 33.3
103% 34.7 MB/s
DQ Read 204
DQ Write 192
DQ Mixed 197
148% 198 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 62.2%
Great: 134%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
335GB free
Firmware: CC38
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 107 110 109 110 110 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
61.2% Good
Read 104
Write 104
Mixed 61.8
SusWrite 109
70% 94.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 68%
Samsung Spinpoint F4 2TB-$119
430GB free
Firmware: 1AQ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 72 74 74 75 75 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
43% Average
Read 75.1
Write 22.5
Mixed 47.2
SusWrite 74.4
40% 54.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
162% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 43%
Great: 72%
Samsung Spinpoint F4 2TB-$119
5GB free
Firmware: 1AQ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 98 106 101 108 101 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
47.2% Average
Read 60.3
Write 36.1
Mixed 57.6
SusWrite 104
48% 64.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
147% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6x4GB
6 of 6 slots used
24GB DIMM
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
41.7% Average
MC Read 16.2
MC Write 11.9
MC Mixed 15.8
42% 14.6 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 8.9
SC Mixed 10.7
28% 9.9 GB/s
Latency 74.5
54% 74.5 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Studio XPS 435T Builds (Compare 52 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: DELL Studio XPS 435T

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $715
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback