PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 43.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 62.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | DELL Studio XPS 435T (all builds) |
Motherboard | DELL 0X501H |
Memory | 44.2 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20090206 |
Uptime | 0.3 Days |
Run Date | Jan 12 '22 at 16:40 |
Run Duration | 173 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 3% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
63%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
CLim: 2205 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 497.29
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
43.4%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$90
175GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 203 209 205 150 152 154 MB/s
|
62.2%
Good
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
335GB free
Firmware: CC38
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 107 110 109 110 110 MB/s
|
61.2%
Good
|
|||
Samsung Spinpoint F4 2TB-$119
430GB free
Firmware: 1AQ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 72 74 74 75 75 MB/s
|
43%
Average
|
|||
Samsung Spinpoint F4 2TB-$119
5GB free
Firmware: 1AQ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 98 106 101 108 101 MB/s
|
47.2%
Average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 6x4GB
6 of 6 slots used
24GB DIMM
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
41.7%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-920Intel $90Bench 62%, 69,074 samples | 31x |
Core i7 940Intel $150Bench 66%, 2,107 samples | 6x |
Xeon X5690IntelBench 75%, 4,873 samples | 4x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 4870ATIBench 9%, 22,563 samples | 9x |
Radeon HD 4670ATIBench 4%, 21,442 samples | 5x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 4x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 21% - Poor | Total price: $715 |