Gigabyte GA-X399 AORUS XTREME-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 94%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 118%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics113% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive252% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte X399 AORUS XTREME
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X399 AORUS XTREME-CF  (all builds)
Memory56.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180724
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateJan 11 '22 at 23:53
Run Duration322 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 2950X-$1,075
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
78.2% Very good
Memory 62.1
1-Core 128
2-Core 255
78% 148 Pts
4-Core 504
8-Core 989
88% 746 Pts
64-Core 2428
150% 2428 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$270
Nvidia(10DE 12A6) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3900 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.11
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
113% Outstanding
Lighting 143
Reflection 155
Parallax 149
117% 149 fps
MRender 190
Gravity 129
Splatting 116
115% 145 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 113%
Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
194GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 751 617 603 596 595 597 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
252% Outstanding
Read 2,551
Write 2,334
Mixed 1,637
SusWrite 627
399% 1,787 MB/s
4K Read 58.8
4K Write 119
4K Mixed 76.4
250% 84.8 MB/s
DQ Read 922
DQ Write 576
DQ Mixed 786
576% 761 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 252%
Great: 340%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$159
713GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2393 2154 1175 1180 1180 1178 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
313% Outstanding
Read 2,534
Write 2,374
Mixed 1,749
SusWrite 1,543
460% 2,050 MB/s
4K Read 59.4
4K Write 127
4K Mixed 77.3
256% 88 MB/s
DQ Read 992
DQ Write 687
DQ Mixed 864
639% 848 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 313%
Great: 372%
Toshiba MG03ACA400 4TB
230GB free
Firmware: FL1D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 69 80 76 74 76 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
59% Above average
Read 130
Write 128
Mixed 51.6
SusWrite 75.2
70% 96.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 0.8
176% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 59%
Great: 96%
Seagate IronWolf 8TB (2016)-$165
6.5TB free
Firmware: SC61
SusWrite @10s intervals: 207 204 202 208 201 204 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 31% Great: 106%
Seagate IronWolf 8TB (2016)-$165
7.5TB free
Firmware: SC61
SusWrite @10s intervals: 210 207 212 211 210 211 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 31% Great: 106%
Seagate ST12000VN0008-2JH101 12TB
5TB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 187 190 194 190 190 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 26% Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
127% Outstanding
MC Read 50.5
MC Write 50.3
MC Mixed 49.9
144% 50.2 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 30.9
SC Mixed 22.6
66% 23.2 GB/s
Latency 122
33% 122 ns
Poor: 76%
This bench: 127%
Great: 184%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X399 AORUS XTREME-CF Builds (Compare 156 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 105%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 127%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X399 AORUS XTREME-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $1,894
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback