Gigabyte GA-X399 AORUS XTREME-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 100%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 128%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics122% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive252% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte X399 AORUS XTREME
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X399 AORUS XTREME-CF  (all builds)
Memory58.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180724
Uptime3.9 Days
Run DateJun 27 '21 at 01:25
Run Duration320 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 2950X-$1,075
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
77.5% Very good
Memory 62.6
1-Core 126
2-Core 251
78% 147 Pts
4-Core 493
8-Core 986
87% 739 Pts
64-Core 2,528
156% 2,528 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$270
Nvidia(10DE 12A6) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 466.11
Performing below potential (42nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
122% Outstanding
Lighting 162
Reflection 166
Parallax 181
132% 170 fps
MRender 179
Gravity 144
Splatting 122
119% 149 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 122%
Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
153GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 779 614 615 617 612 617 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
252% Outstanding
Read 2,486
Write 2,349
Mixed 1,633
SusWrite 642
397% 1,778 MB/s
4K Read 59.9
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 76.3
252% 85.6 MB/s
DQ Read 926
DQ Write 618
DQ Mixed 829
603% 791 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 252%
Great: 340%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$159
777GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2388 2152 1166 1182 1182 1183 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
316% Outstanding
Read 2,527
Write 2,379
Mixed 1,722
SusWrite 1,542
458% 2,042 MB/s
4K Read 59.3
4K Write 129
4K Mixed 79
259% 89 MB/s
DQ Read 1,002
DQ Write 793
DQ Mixed 928
686% 908 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 316%
Great: 372%
Toshiba MG03ACA400 4TB
337GB free
Firmware: FL1D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 97 95 96 99 93 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
69.7% Good
Read 147
Write 151
Mixed 63.8
SusWrite 95.5
84% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 1.1
217% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 96%
Seagate IronWolf 8TB (2016)-$165
7.5TB free
Firmware: SC61
SusWrite @10s intervals: 216 225 225 224 228 224 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 31% Great: 106%
Seagate IronWolf 8TB (2016)-$165
7.5TB free
Firmware: SC61
SusWrite @10s intervals: 216 224 225 226 226 226 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 31% Great: 106%
Seagate ST12000VN0008-2JH101 12TB
5TB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 186 190 191 191 190 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 26% Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
131% Outstanding
MC Read 52.2
MC Write 54.2
MC Mixed 50
149% 52.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 31.3
SC Mixed 21.6
65% 22.9 GB/s
Latency 120
33% 120 ns
Poor: 76%
This bench: 131%
Great: 184%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 12 10 30 36.1" 1280 720 TCL0000 55S401
Typical GA-X399 AORUS XTREME-CF Builds (Compare 156 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 105%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 127%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X399 AORUS XTREME-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $1,894
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback