Asrock Z77 Pro4-M

Performance Results


Gaming 38% Jet ski	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 33% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	55.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	53.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asrock Z77 Pro4-M (all builds)
Memory	5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit väriä,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130711
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 11 '22 at 18:37
Run Duration	145 Seconds
Run User	FIN-User
Background CPU	5%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$297 278,207 User benchmarks, average bench 69% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	67.2% Good	Memory 89.5 1-Core 102 2-Core 166 72% 119 Pts	4-Core 243 8-Core 492 43% 368 Pts	64-Core 508 32% 508 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 67.2% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Asus(1043 85B1) CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2102 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 497.29 Performing below potential (95^th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (69 fps cap detected)	55.5% Above average	Lighting 68.5 Reflection 69.7 Parallax 64 56% 67.4 fps	MRender 69.1 Gravity 69.6 Splatting 63.4 55% 67.4 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 55.5% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$28 142,801 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 79GB free (System drive) Firmware: M6CR013 SusWrite @10s intervals: 404 85 130 36 79 94 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	53.6% Above average	Read 471 Write 368 Mixed 398 SusWrite 138 77% 344 MB/s	4K Read 23.5 4K Write 80.9 4K Mixed 0.4 79% 34.9 MB/s	DQ Read 229 DQ Write 7.6 DQ Mixed 32.1 45% 89.4 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 53.6% Great: 92%
Kingston SKC600256G 256GB 6,756 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 238GB free Firmware: S4500104 SusWrite @10s intervals: 426 411 428 439 439 445 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	103% Outstanding	Read 474 Write 437 Mixed 406 SusWrite 431 98% 437 MB/s	4K Read 31.3 4K Write 69.1 4K Mixed 41.3 137% 47.2 MB/s	DQ Read 308 DQ Write 349 DQ Mixed 260 215% 306 MB/s
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 128%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5273CH0-CK0 2x4GB 4,484 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	32.5% Below average	MC Read 11.2 MC Write 9.9 MC Mixed 8.9 29% 10 GB/s	SC Read 11.3 SC Write 12.1 SC Mixed 11.3 33% 11.6 GB/s	Latency 67.9 59% 67.9 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 32.5% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z77 Pro4-M Builds (Compare 332 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 56%

Gunboat

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 43%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Pro4-M

CPU
Core i5-3570KIntel $136Bench 68%, 185,516 samples	89x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	76x
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	58x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	25x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	24x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	21x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	25x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $75Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	17x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	15x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	10x
RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBG.SKILLBench 53%, 47,852 samples	8x
Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 54%, 12,350 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 85% - Excellent

Total price: $368

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16